Summer residents have had a hard time proving that they are not stealing electricity. In general, the burden of proving circumstances indicating an unjustified tax benefit rests with the tax authority

“The time has come to prove patriotism through labor” - He said at a meeting with students of the North Caucasian State Medical Institute - people from South Ossetia the president of this republic is Eduard Kokoity. Yesterday this meeting took place between students of the North Caucasus Mining and Metallurgical Institute and the President of South Ossetia Eduard Kokoity. About 200 students from the fraternal republic, including 40 target people, had the opportunity to ask questions about the current situation beyond the Roki Pass, about how South Ossetia is recovering after the August events of 2008, about the prospects for their personal employment in the republic.

Eduard Kokoity himself set the direction for a frank conversation in this audience, noting: “We must say not only what we like to say, but also what needs to be said today in order to clarify the situation.”

But before starting to communicate with students, the president presented the award of this independent republic - the Order of Friendship - to the rector of SKGMI Vladimir Vagin for fruitful cooperation. After all, the institute provides comprehensive assistance to the South Ossetian education system. In addition, the university was one of the first after the end of hostilities in Tskhinvali to form and send student construction teams there to clear the territory and begin rebuilding the city. And on the eve of the 65th anniversary of the Victory, the university initiated the “65 good deeds” campaign for veterans living in South Ossetia.

Now the time has come to prove your patriotism through peaceful work - at construction sites and factories, where your knowledge and skills acquired at SKGMI are needed,” Eduard Kokoity addressed the students. - After all, restoring the republic after those terrible August days is no easier than fighting for its independence. Of course, Russia provides us with invaluable assistance, North Ossetia, but what the appearance of our republic will be, whether it will be able to fully rise to its feet, depends only on us, citizens of South Ossetia. Know, guys, we are counting on you. We must all work together to make South Ossetia a thriving and dynamically developing republic.

Eduard Kokoity said that the republic is looking for young builders and architects, economists and financiers, managers and teachers. However, so far none of those who left South Ossetia to study are in a hurry to return. Since 2001, only 8 target graduates have returned to the republic out of thousands heading to Russian universities.

But yesterday, among those who gathered at SKGMI, there were those who intend to return to their native republic to work in it. For example, fifth-year student Revaz Bestaev writes thesis on the topic “Road infrastructure of South Ossetia”. And he asked whether specialists in his field are needed in the republic now. To which Eduard Kokoity replied that today, at a time of intensive development of the republic, young, qualified and, most importantly, interested in the progress of South Ossetia, personnel are needed here like air. This is confirmed by the figures cited by the president: 157 newly built and reconstructed houses have already been commissioned in the republic, with over 350 more in the pipeline. 118 apartments in municipal buildings and 2 kindergartens have also been restored at the expense of the republican budget. But during the August war, more than 70% of private and municipal housing was damaged.

Frankly speaking, it is not easy for us to defend the interests of the republic; many of the organizations involved in restoration work in South Ossetia have personal gain as their goal,” continued Eduard Kokoity. - Let me give you an example: one man himself found funds and reconstructed a house that was damaged during the Georgian aggression. This cost him 470 thousand rubles, which followed from the estimate he presented. He was entitled to reimbursement of these funds from the republican budget. But at the State Unitary Enterprise for the Restoration of South Ossetia, where he was supposed to be reimbursed for this amount, he was told that contracts are not concluded directly with the owners of houses, and this must be done through their contractor, who will draw up his own estimate for this work. As a result, such an estimate, passed through the Pricing Center, already amounted to 1 million 786 thousand rubles... And we have many similar examples, when someone wants, roughly speaking, to “make money” at the expense of South Ossetia. I can say that in the last four months alone, thanks to the integrity of South Ossetian officials, 1 billion 586 million rubles were, so to speak, “saved” on such attempts to write off funds.

In his speech to the youth of the North Caucasus State Medical Institute, President Kokoity did not ignore another topic that is on the lips of many today:

There are no provocative conversations around South Ossetia today. But I don’t see the point in reacting to them - this time can be spent on solving much more important problems. I just want to warn you: the forces that lost the war in South Ossetia in 2008 cannot calm down in any way and have taken a different path. They understand that we survived those difficult times of genocide thanks to our unity and support. They are trying to divide us, but we must not give in, we must not lose faith in ourselves and each other. Judge by facts, not by idle talk.

Vice-Rector of SKGMI Oleg Gabaraev voiced the situation with housing for his students: “Many children’s housing in South Ossetia is unsuitable for living. Is it possible to restore one building as a temporary hostel for young professionals until they rebuild their homes? From us - the workers who will take on this object, from you - the means and materials...”

The President replied that this proposal would be considered, especially since the republic has a reserve fund, funds from which can be used for these purposes.

But, he continued, if we implement this project, it must be truly temporary housing. Because many of our fellow countrymen have formed dependent ideas - that someone should create conditions for them, provide them with a house - renovated and furnished... And today many do not want to be anything other than refugees, trying to “squeeze” out of this their status as much as possible more privileges. But we will not feed such a trend.

When I graduate from college, I need to go to work in my homeland, I will definitely be useful to my republic, and knowledge of my profession will help me with this, - students shared such plans with their classmates in the foyer of the educational building after the meeting. - In the end, this is now an independent state, there is an international political space, and now there are much more prospects for realizing oneself in the profession. Let's go!..

And those around nodded in agreement.

So we will find out after the issuance of diplomas - these are words for the occasion or a position. Citizen and patriot.

That saying of the great Russian writer expresses a very deep and correct thought. Man is a higher, intelligent being, sharply separated from the rest of the world. The making of tools separated man from the animal environment.

The entire human body is adapted to work. He has free hands, which he does not rely on when walking. The structure of the hands is such that they are convenient for grasping, moving and holding objects: they are extremely capable of precise movements. Human legs are adapted to walking on the ground.

Humans have an extremely highly organized nervous system, especially the brain" By weight, our brain is almost three times larger ( average weight it is about 1500 g) than the brain of the higher large apes - gorillas and chimpanzees - and is much more complex in structure.

Human labor is of a social nature. This requires people to have mutual understanding. It is achieved primarily through articulate speech. Animals have weaker means of communication. They are expressed in screams and expressive body movements.

Already this brief description the basic characteristics of man shows how far he has gone from the rest of the animal world. But modern science has shown not only how various bodily features of the human body arose, but also how what most distinguishes man from an animal appeared and developed, and first of all labor, articulate speech and other features. Paleontology and anthropology show what human ancestors were like. Archeology - a science that studies the material monuments of ancient culture and the development of ancient human society - reveals to us the history of the emergence and development of human society, its productive forces and production relations.

In the second half of the last century, Charles Darwin and other scientists showed that the ancestor of man was a breed of ape, covered with hair, with a small tail and rather large fangs. And indeed, comparing people with apes, one can see not only differences, but also many similarities in the structure of the skeleton, muscles, internal organs, V chemical composition blood and a number of other features.

The orangutan has about 50 common characteristics with humans, the gorilla has 90, and the chimpanzee has about 100. However, Darwin and other scientists did not know the real ancestors of humans: they had not yet been discovered. They also failed to explain how and why basic human characteristics arose.

The main reason for the emergence of man, the humanization of our ape-like ancestors, was established about 80 years ago by Friedrich Engels. In his work “The Role of Labor in the Process of Transformation of Ape into Man,” he proved that labor played a decisive role in the emergence of man.

The decisive step from ape to man was made during the transition to a terrestrial lifestyle and the development of an upright gait. The development of forest-steppes and steppes in the second half and especially at the end of the Tertiary period over vast areas of Asia, Europe and Africa led to the extinction of many species of monkeys. Others adapted to life on Earth rather than in trees. “If the upright gait of our hairy ancestors was destined to become first a rule and then a necessity, then this suggests that in the meantime more and more other activities fell to the lot of the hands. Already among monkeys there is a well-known division of functions between the arms and legs" ( F. Engels. Dialectics of nature, M., Gogpolitizdat, 1955, p. 133).

Bipedal walking freed up hands with which the monkeys could grab stones and sticks to defend themselves from enemies; in addition, they could also dig the ground with sticks, looking for roots and plant bulbs, and insect larvae. “Before the first flint was turned into a knife by the human hand, such a long period of time must have passed that in comparison with it the historical period known to us is insignificant. But the decisive step was taken, the hand became free and could now assimilate acquired more and more new skills, and the greater flexibility acquired by this was passed on by inheritance and increased from generation to generation.

The hand, therefore, is not only an organ of labor, it is also a product of it" ( F. Engels. Ibid., page 133).

Engels expressed the essence of the entire process of the emergence of man in three words: “Labor created man.” He believed that the process of humanizing the ape took place over enormous periods of time.

After the work of Darwin and Engels, many discoveries were made in science that confirmed, supplemented and developed their thoughts.

In 1891, on the island of Java, in layers dating back to the beginning of the Anthropocene, the age of which is estimated at approximately 1 million years, the Dutch scientist Dubois found the remains of ancient people, or Pithecanthropus. Pithecanthropus translated from Greek means “ape-man.” Darwin suggested the existence of such intermediate creatures between man and ape, and his scientific foresight was brilliantly confirmed. Judging by the size of the hips, the height of Pithecanthropus was about 170 centimeters, and the volume of the brain, as shown by the skull cap, turned out to be approximately 900 cubic centimeters (in modern man, as we have already said, - 1400-1500 cm3). This ancient man still carried many ape-like features: he had a low sloping forehead, sharply protruding supraorbital ridges, and the entire cranial vault was very low. Judging by the relief on the skull, the inferior frontal gyrus of the brain, where the motor center of speech is located, is much more developed than in monkeys. In terms of the structure of the hip, the ape-man is closer to the modern one than in the structure of the brain and skull. He had an awkward but straight gait. Subsequently, skulls of other Pithecanthropus and the crude stone tools they made were found in Java. But, apparently, they did not yet know how to use fire. When Pithecanthropus lived, Java was connected to the mainland and represented the southeastern tip of Asia. The climate was similar to today's, but a little cooler. Together with Pithecanthropus, elephants, tapirs, deer, monkeys and other animals lived in the forests.

The distribution area of ​​Pithecanthropus was not limited to Java or even South Asia. IN recent years French scientists found the mandibles of similar people, along with simple stone tools, in North Africa, in Algeria.

In 1927, the Chinese archaeologist Pei Wenzhong made another remarkable discovery in caves near Beijing. In connection with systematic excavations carried out in caves near the village of Zhou Kau Tien over a number of years, the bones of many ape-men were found of different ages and floors, bones of various animals, crude stone tools, remains of fires. They were called Sinanthropus, that is, Chinese ape-men. Sinanthropus lived 100-200 thousand years later than Pithecanthropus and in its own way physical development and culture have moved ahead in comparison with them. Sinanthropus had a brain with a volume of about 1100 cubic centimeters and a more convex forehead than Pithecanthropus. This development of the brain was obviously associated with the constant production and use of tools. Sinanthropus is observed to develop right-handedness - using predominantly the right hand when working. This is evidenced by significant asymmetry of the brain.

At the same time, with difficulty, thinking and speech arose and developed in the most ancient ancestors of modern people. Speech is a means of communication between people, and in social and working life, cases of mutual support and joint activities have become a necessity. “First, work, and then, along with it, articulate speech, were the two most important stimuli, under the influence of which the monkey’s brain gradually turned into the human brain, which, for all its similarities with the monkey’s, far surpasses it in size and perfection. And in parallel with the further The development of the brain was accompanied by the further development of its closest tools - the sense organs" ( ).

The fact that synanthropes could speak is evidenced by the complex relief in the area of ​​the lower part of the left frontal gyrus of their brain, where the so-called motor speech center is located. The limbs of Sinanthropus, even more than the skull, resemble in structure the limbs of modern humans.

During the era of the existence of Sinanthropus, the climate in northern China was milder and damper than it is now. Many generations of Sinanthropus lived in caves. They used fire. However, as research has shown, they did not yet know how to artificially produce fire. The fire produced during a forest or steppe fire or volcanic eruption was maintained, not allowing it to go out. Like Pithecanthropus, Sinanthropus lived in small groups, collectively collecting plant food - fruits, berries, roots, and jointly hunting various rodents, wild horses, wild boars, buffalos, sometimes even elephants and rhinoceroses. This was the initial stage of the primitive communal system, the first socio-economic formation in human history.

The distribution of Sinanthropus was not limited to Northern China. Finds of bones of people standing at approximately the same level were made in various places in Europe, Asia and Africa. Back in 1907, near the city of Heidelberg, in Germany, the lower jaw of a primitive man close to Sinanthropus was found. Recently, the bones of a man resembling Sinanthropus were found in Central Vietnam. In various places in Africa, remains of various ancient people have been discovered, close to Pithecanthropus and Sinanthropus or to primitive people who appeared later. These are the "Cape Telanthropus", close to Sinanthropus and Heidelberg people, Afrikanthropus, which is called African Sinanthropus. According to some characteristics, Afritropians are already similar to primitive people, or Neanderthals.

Without a doubt, paleontological and archaeological research in the future will reveal new ancient fossils of people of various physical types who were on the path of development to modern man.

Several hundred thousand years ago, from the ancient people about whom we spoke, primitive people developed, standing between the modern type of man and the ape-man. These primitive people were called Neanderthals (after the Neanderthal River valley in Germany, where their remains were first found in 1856). Their head and arms have already lost most of their apelike characteristics and become almost human. Primitive people were short, about 160 centimeters, but they were distinguished by significant strength. They were stocky, muscular, slightly stooped, with wide, protruding faces, with a wide, sometimes strongly protruding nose. The teeth are large, strong, adapted for chewing solid food. Monkey features were reflected in the powerfully developed supraorbital ridges, obliquely set teeth and the absence of a chin. The lower leg and forearm were relatively short, and the hands and feet were massive, which made the movements of Neanderthals clumsy. This is the general portrait of a Neanderthal, which is reconstructed by anatomists and anthropologists based on the study of his bone remains. Soviet anthropologist M. M. Gerasimov developed an accurate restoration technique appearance people's faces based on their skulls. This gives us the opportunity to see portraits of our ancestors who lived tens and hundreds of thousands of years ago.

Neanderthals had a large head, and their brain volume was on average 1400-1500 cubic centimeters. Their speech center in the brain was better developed than Pithecanthropus and Sinanthropus. Their bones were found in

Europe, Central Asia, Palestine, Java and South Africa (Rhodesia). They were not in America and Australia. In the USSR, they were discovered in the caves of Crimea near Simferopol, in Uzbekistan (Teshik-Tash grotto near the city of Baysun). Along with the remains of bones and skeletons of Neanderthals, stone tools and other objects of material culture dating back to the ancient Stone Age were discovered. Neanderthals were better at making rough stone wedges (axes), various scrapers and other tools than their predecessors. Bone processing was just in its infancy. There is no doubt that they also used wooden tools - clubs, spears, digging sticks. But they didn’t reach us.

The favorite habitats of Neanderthals were caves and river valleys. They collected edible plants, their fruits, roots, and also hunted various wild animals. Neanderthals made extensive use of fire and probably knew how to produce it by rubbing pieces of wood or hitting flint stones.

Neanderthals, like other ancient people, led hard and harsh lives. Most of them, as the study of bone remains shows, died or perished in childhood and young age. They had to fight with nature: overcome climatic and other adversities, defend themselves from attacks by wild animals, etc. Therefore, V.I. Lenin said that there was no golden age behind us and that primitive man was depressed by the difficulty of existence.

Interestingly, Neanderthals and the Cro-Magnons who replaced them suffered from rheumatism and traumatic injuries. They did not have many diseases characteristic of later people (for example, tuberculosis, dental caries).

Over the course of approximately 300-400 thousand years, the body of primitive man was improved. Gradually, as a result of labor, his entire appearance changed. About 100 thousand years ago, descendants of Neanderthals appeared, outwardly similar to modern humans - Cro-Magnons.

At this time, the great cooling on Earth was greatest. But man has already learned to make clothes and master fire well. He also learned to make thin and long, like a knife blade, silicon plates and other well-processed tools. Widely used for various crafts and bone. Carefully finished knives, awls, scrapers, chisels, bone needles with eyes for sewing clothes, etc. appeared. This was the late ancient Stone Age. In the sites of these ancient people of modern appearance, in addition to household items and hunting tools, female figurines or various images of animals carved from mammoth ivory are found, and in the caves skillfully made drawings were found.

Collecting plants and hunting were still the main means of subsistence for the new, or, as they are called, intelligent people. The first "new people" were nomadic hunters. They even hunted such large animals as bison, rhinoceros and mammoth. They especially exterminated reindeer, as well as sheep, partridges and other small animals. When excavating their sites, they usually find many bones of various animals that remained from “mammoth and reindeer hunters.”

Tens of thousands of years passed. Major changes took place in the way of life and in the economy of people. They developed settled settlements, and about 15-20 thousand years ago, on the verge of the modern geological era - the “Holocene” - man invented the bow and arrow. This expanded hunting opportunities. A new era has begun in the history of mankind - the New Stone Age, or Neolithic. By this time, man had already become an inhabitant of dwellings, the owner of various clothes, he surrounded himself with domestic animals and cultivated plants. However, 6000-7000 years ago the Stone Age ended. The era of metal has arrived. Man moved from collecting ready-made products of nature to consciously producing and accumulating them. He became a transformer of nature. But this is the topic of a special book. We will continue our journey into the depths of time, into the distant history of life.

Darwin discovered the laws of evolution of plants and animals and explained why organisms do not remain constant, but change and develop. He proved that lower animals gave rise to higher ones, that the ancestor of man was the monkey. This is Darwin's great merit. However, even this brilliant scientist was unable to fully uncover the mystery of how the monkey turned into a completely different creature - person. Darwin believed that the existing differences between man and ape are not so significant, that they are approximately of the same order as the differences that exist between the ape and lower mammals. Darwin's incorrect view of man as a species of animal gave rise to reactionaries to claim that the laws governing the lives of animals apply to human society. As you know, in a class society, all the benefits are enjoyed by an insignificant minority, which does not directly produce itself, but lives off the labor of others. The vast majority of working people, who create untold wealth, suffer poverty, often go hungry, get sick and die untimely. The reason for this abnormal phenomenon is that in a class society the means of production - a significant part of the land, factories and factories - means of transportation and communications, banks belong not to the entire people, but to the landowners and capitalists. Under these conditions, production does not serve the purpose of satisfying the needs of the people, but capitalists' profit. We already know that to justify social inequality, the exploiting classes use religion, which teaches that everything that exists is eternal and unchanging. But this is not the only means used by the reaction. For the same purposes, exploiters also attract science, which they distort and falsify in advance. Here is one of many examples.

Malthus' priest theory

Long before Darwin, a certain English pop Malthus(1766–1834) tried to prove that poverty, hunger and the extinction of working people were explained by “natural” causes. In his opinion, people reproduce in excessive numbers, and nature is not able to provide everyone with the necessary means of subsistence. As a result, competition, a struggle for existence, seems to arise between people. In this struggle, the strongest, the most adapted to life, win, and all those of little value are deprived. The only recipe that Malthus came up with for changing the existing situation was a recommendation to workers to reproduce less. Darwin borrowed uncritically Malthus' theory and applied it to plants and animals. Plants and animals, according to Darwin's teachings, reproduce in excessive numbers and are forced to compete with each other for territory, for light, warmth and food. In this struggle, those specimens that have some biological advantages over others survive and give birth to offspring. Scientists and unscientific reactionaries hastened to use Darwin's Malthusian error to declare that the struggle for existence is a universal law of both nature and society. The learned defenders of capitalism used this fictitious law to declare the exploiters the winners in the struggle for existence, more adapted to life, “the best,” and the working people the “worst,” unviable.

The barbaric fabrications of the Malthusians

Modern Malthusians are not content with merely recommending that the poor reproduce less, but demand the physical extermination of all “superfluous” people, that is, the unemployed and generally dissatisfied with capitalism, striving to change the existing system and establish a more just social order. According to the Malthusians, the best means of exterminating “superfluous” people is depriving them of medical care and unemployment benefits, the spread of epidemics and, above all, war. The extent to which the Malthusian cannibals are capable of going can be judged by a book published in 1948 in the USA, which states that out of the 2,250 million population of the globe, approximately 900 million people can be fed to their fullest. The remaining 1,350 million must be exterminated, and war is the best means for this, especially since it brings huge profits to the capitalists. The barbaric fabrications of the Malthusians have nothing in common with science and contradict the facts. From year to year, as science and technology develop, agriculture and industry are producing more and more products, quite sufficient to more than satisfy the needs of the world's population. However, these means of subsistence under capitalism do not go to those who produce them. The best example is the USA. While American capitalists rake in tens and hundreds of billions of dollars in profits, millions of working people are deprived of their homes, eat garbage, get sick without the means to treat them, and die prematurely. Very often, owners pour kerosene on and burn or throw into the sea millions of tons of grain, potatoes, coffee, meat and other products that sit in warehouses and cannot be sold. The capitalists, of course, do not lose anything by this, since the cost of the destroyed products falls in the form of a cape on the remaining goods entering the market. It turns out that the small buyer is paying for the crimes of the capitalists. This is what the fictional “natural” struggle for existence looks like in human society under capitalism. It must be said that Darwin did not even think of drawing reactionary conclusions from theories of the struggle for existence. Darwin was not only a great scientist, but also a progressive man who hated exploitation and oppression. Contrary to the falsifiers of his teachings, Darwin in his book “ A Naturalist's Journey Around the World“said in the sense that the poverty of some and the excessive wealth of others are not at all a consequence of the laws of nature, but depend on the given state structure.

How is a person different from an animal?

Darwin wrote about American blacks that they were very smart, hardworking, good-natured workers and were in many ways superior to white slave owners, whom he called “the fiends of hell.” Darwin viewed slavery as a phenomenon disgraceful to human dignity, the destruction of which would not be a pity to spend a million lives. Thus, Darwin himself believed that the social inequality of people does not at all stem from some “laws of nature” and that, therefore, the social life of people cannot be compared to the life of animals. Indeed, man has long been and forever separated from his animal relatives. A bottomless abyss has formed between man and all animals, which cannot be filled by anything. A bridge cannot be thrown across this abyss that would again connect man with animals. What is the difference between man and animals? In labor, in the ability of people to make tools and, with the help of these tools, create something new that did not previously exist. Human labor is conscious and creative in nature. Each of us, before starting work, builds a plan of action in our minds in advance and envisages the future result of our work. Everything that surrounds a person is created or transformed by his labor. A person, as they say, lives in an artificial environment, or environment, created by himself. Our home, furniture, clothes are created by human hands. Our food is not a “gift of God” and did not fall from heaven ready-made. The bread we eat was sown on previously cultivated soil. It was harvested, threshed, ground and baked. Plowing and sowing the land, harvesting crops and baking bread required tools, also made by humans. It turns out that a lot of people work for each of us. But every person, without even realizing it, does something for the benefit of others. Our work is thus of a social nature. There are no isolated people, loners who work only for themselves and do not benefit from the labor of others. Whether a student goes to school to study, or a worker goes to a factory to work, both are engaged in useful social activities. Wherever we are and whatever we do, we constantly increase our experience, improve our qualifications, develop our abilities, adopt the experience of others and share our knowledge with others. Today we know: more than yesterday, tomorrow we will know more than today. We, therefore, are constantly growing and developing culturally. Thanks to this, there is a continuous cultural development of humanity, an increase in its material and spiritual wealth, and an improvement in working methods. Is this the case with animals? Of course not. Animals do not produce anything, but only destroy what they find ready-made in nature. Animals, if such an expression is permissible, conduct a predatory “economy.” This applies not only to wild animals, but also to domestic animals.

Animal labor

Some argue that work is not a characteristic of man, that even lower animals are capable of work. stickleback fish, for example, builds nests. Birds are very intricate when building nests: they weave plants, sew leaves to form bags, sculpt their houses from clay, etc. Among insects, bees are the most skillful builders. These same insects have a strict division of labor between drones, honey bees, and queens.
Beavers can build huge structures. They gnaw and fell trees, from which they build dams that raise the water level in reservoirs; they dig underground channels. One can give countless other examples from the life of animals - weavers and tailors, diggers and hydraulic engineers, wax workers and others. And yet this diverse activity of animals has nothing in common with human labor. Animal labor is an unconscious activity. Animals act instinctively, driven by unconscious drives.
All animals of the same species build their homes from the same material, in the same uniform way, and most often at a strictly defined time of year. Animals cannot help but “work,” just as they cannot, while they live, not eat or reproduce. Even when in captivity, in a locked cage, wild animals, if given the appropriate material, begin to senselessly “work” on the construction of a dwelling they do not need. But let’s leave animals in general and turn to the smartest of them – the apes close to us. Let's remember Sultan, Raphael. Their behavior is much reminiscent of human behavior. Mimus learned from people to use a plate, spoon and fork, put a pre-knotted napkin around his neck and move his chair to the table. But he did this because he was rewarded with food. At the same time, Mimus always acted monotonously, according to the habit he had developed, which became second nature to him. And that's all. After much fuss, the Sultan figured out how to stick one bamboo stick into another. But if the hole in the stick had been smaller in diameter than the thickness of the second stick, the Sultan would not have thought of sharpening this stick, that is, he would not have gone so far as to artificially process it. In other words, the Sultan turned out to be able to use a ready-made item, but not make anything new. Raphael was also incapable of creating anything new. He used a ready-made pole to move from one raft to another. Raphael opened the tank tap, filled his mouth with water to pour it on the fire. But this smart monkey didn’t think of turning off the tap to keep the water in the tank. It follows from this that those who believe that a monkey is “almost human” and that there is no fundamental difference between humans and monkeys are wrong. In reality, the monkey is an animal, and not “almost a person.” The statement to the contrary is based on a misunderstanding of the essence of human labor. But they can say: if such a deep gap really exists between man and monkey, then how could it happen that an animal (monkey) turned into a fundamentally new creature - a man? The answer to this question is given by the doctrine first expounded by the ally of Karl Marx (1818–1883) - Friedrich Engels(1820–1895). According to this theory, labor was the motivator that forced the monkey to turn into a man. But a new question arises. After all, animals, as we have already seen, are unable to work. How did our ancestors, the monkeys, get to work? Let's try to answer this question. Ancient monkeys , which gave rise to modern anthropomorphic apes and humans, were arboreal animals. The arboreal lifestyle turned these monkeys into bipedal and two-armed animals. An example is modern apes. Pay attention to how a person climbs up a vertical pole or tree trunk. At the same time, his lower limbs serve as a support for the body, and with his upper limbs the person clasps the pole. Next, the person pulls up his legs, rests on them, straightens his body as far as possible, moves his arms higher and wraps them around the post again. Monkeys act in a similar way when climbing trees: their lower limbs serve as support for the body, and with their upper limbs they clasp the trunk. Being in the thick of evergreen tree crowns, monkeys move in a semi-erect state. With their lower limbs they rest on thick branches, and at the same time clasp them with their movable toes, and with their upper limbs they hold on to the thinner branches located above. The monkeys also use their upper limbs to pluck leaves and fruits from trees and defend themselves from enemies. On their upper limbs, monkeys are suspended from branches before making a jump. In short, the upper and lower limbs of anthropomorphic monkeys largely serve different purposes, being, in essence, arms and legs. Ancient fossil anthropomorphic monkeys also possessed such limbs, which is confirmed by their bone remains. These ancient monkeys, therefore, constituted a transitional form from animals to humans. Now imagine that, due to the thinning and disappearance of forests, ancient monkeys stopped living in trees and turned into land animals. Living in open, treeless places and having legs adapted for semi-straightened movement, they began to walk on two legs more and more often. This was very beneficial for them: using only their lower limbs for movement, the ancient monkeys were freed up for other purposes. With their upper limbs, monkeys could defend themselves from enemies by throwing stones and sticks at them. Monkeys could use sticks to dig out larvae and edible roots from the ground. If you have free hands, the next step is not difficult - to crush one stone with another and select the most suitable fragment for certain purposes with a sharp end or cutting edge. But this is already an artificially made tool, albeit a very simple one. The next step - and the monkeys who had taken the path of humanization had to figure out how to sharpen a flint fragment with the help of another fragment, break off a stick accordingly, and sharpen its end using the sharp edge of the flint. This is the initial form of labor. Thus, with the transition to upright walking and the freeing of hands from the need to participate in the movement of the body, our semi-animal ancestors began to increasingly resort to labor and thereby began to turn from animals into people. Of course, this path was very long, and it took hundreds of thousands of years to overcome it. But still, once it began, the humanization of the monkey did not stop and continued to accelerate until the animal completely turned into a human. About three-quarters of a century has passed since Engels outlined his theory of the humanization of the ape. During this time, scientists have accumulated a huge amount of material that confirms this theory. Thus, in Northern India in 1934–1935, bone remains (jaws with teeth) of a highly developed monkey, Ramapithecus, very close to humans, were found. Of even greater interest are bone finds of extinct ancient monkeys, called Australopithecines, which means “southern apes.” The first partial skull and part of the lower jaw of a young Australopithecus was discovered in 1924 in South Africa. Subsequently, a significant number of bones of these monkeys were found (the last find was in 1948). The bones found include many skulls, mandibles and other skeletal bones. These finds indicate that (there are several species) they were large monkeys that moved on two legs, and that their hands were free from participation in movement. The Australopithecus braincase contains approximately 500 cubic centimeters of brain. The teeth are almost no different from human teeth, and the fangs are no larger than other teeth. Along with the bones of australopithecines, skeletal remains of baboons were also found, including broken skulls. Some scientists suggest that Australopithecines hunted baboons by breaking their heads with stones. Whether this is true or not is difficult to say with certainty. One thing is certain: Australopithecines were highly developed apes with upright posture. They represent the transitional stage from monkeys to ape-men. And the latter, as we already know, constitute the initial stage in.