Parsing the proposal how. Syntactic parsing of a complex sentence: The order of syntactic parsing of a complex sentence

How to parse correctly

Analyzing a sentence and drawing up a diagram are included in the basic knowledge of the school curriculum. Therefore, such tasks are given to students already in elementary school, where they learn to parse a simple text structure.

In grades 5–8 and 9–11, the task becomes more complicated: new terms and additional characteristics. A full set of signs is given already in the 7th–8th grades. To correctly draw up a diagram, you need to understand the essence of the analysis and remember a few rules.

What is sentence parsing

The answer lies in the term itself. Syntax is a system of rules for connecting with each other different units. Accordingly, the purpose of syntactic analysis of a text structure is to show the connections between its components.

Please note

For parsing, the text or the required part of it is written out in a notebook, one line at a time, so that there is room for underlining and markings above the words.

How to parse a sentence correctly? A plan illustrated with examples will help answer this question.

Analysis algorithm and characteristics

There is a clear order parsing. If you stick to it, there will be no problems.

A simple sentence is a unit of a syntax system that has only one predicative part. This means that only one grammatical basis (two-part) or only one main member (one-part) can be identified in it. The order of its parsing is as follows:

1. In a two-part sentence, find and emphasize the subject (what is being said) and the predicate (what is being said); in a one-component – ​​the main member:

2. Determine the type by the content of the speaker’s task, or by the purpose of the utterance:

• Narrative: The dug-up road sleeps. (S. Yesenin)
• Interrogative: What should we do in the village? (A. Pushkin)
• Incentive: Let's go to Tsarskoe Selo! (O. Mandelstam)

3. Syntactic parsing of a sentence is not complete without several characteristics:

3.1. By composition:

Two-part – both subject and predicate are present:

Monocomponent differs in that the subject (what is said) and the predicate (what is said) are expressed by one member. It is not called “subject” or “predicate”, as in two-part, because its meaning is not reducible to either of these components. To designate this unit, the term “main member of a one-component sentence” (PCHOP) is used.

You also need to specify the type of one-part:

• Definitely personal - GCOP is expressed by a verb of the 1st and 2nd person singular. h. Closest to two-part: the unnamed subject of the action is restored by the listener according to the form of the verb.
  Examples:
  I love the sandy slope (A. Pushkin)
  What are you doing, honey? (A. Ostrovsky)
  Please leave them, leave quickly. (Yu. Dombrovsky)
• Indefinite-personal – GCOP is expressed by a 3rd person plural verb. h. When parsing a sentence syntactically, it is important to understand the connection between form and meaning: here such a verb is used because the subject of the action is not so important or expressed collectively.
  Examples:
  “We don’t carry machine guns! We have no weapons!” - they shout from the trucks. (V. Makanin).
  Brick and concrete wall surfaces are finished with plaster ( Landscape design. 2003. No2)
• Generalized-personal – GCHOP is expressed by a verb of the 2nd person singular. h. (less often - in the form of the 1st person singular and plural). Meaning – generalization of personal or collective experience.
  Examples:
  You do something for him, you fight like a fly in a web... (A. Volkov)
  You won’t recognize a friend without trouble (last)
  They don’t go to someone else’s monastery with their own rules (last)
• Impersonal - expresses the manifestation of processes or states that occur or exist independently of the active figure. The independence of action from the subject, the inability to change the course of events, is a key feature of this type. During the syntactic parsing of sentences, impersonal units are those units whose PHOP is expressed by a state category, an adverb or an infinitive.
  Examples:
  I felt scared - so be it...
  We can't do magic with Tatyana. (A. Pushkin)
  Since the evening he had been uneasy, either shivering or aching. (A. Solzhenitsyn)
• Nominative (nominative) – denotes an object in space, indicates, gives an assessment. Most often, GCHOP is expressed by a noun, which is in the nominative case.
  Examples:
  Warm gusts of wind,
  Distant thunder and rain sometimes... (F. Tyutchev)

3.2. By prevalence

• unextended - there are only main members: We were leaving. (R. Rozhdestvensky)
• common - there are both major and minor: The golden grove dissuaded me // With birch, cheerful language. (S. Yesenin)

3.3. By completeness

• complete – self-sufficient in meaning: I love thunderstorms in early May (F. Tyutchev)
• incomplete – the meaning is not clear without context: Do you love chess? - Not good. (S. Dovlatov). It is impossible to understand the meaning of the answer outside the context of the question.

4. The next stage of syntactic parsing of a sentence is identifying cases of complication:

Homogeneous members:

I wandered in a toy thicket // And discovered an azure grotto... (O. Mandelstam)– complication with homogeneous predicates.

Separate members:

• Participial phrase: The Krasovs' great-grandfather, nicknamed the Gypsy by the courtyard, was hunted down by the master Durnovo with greyhounds. (I. Bunin)
• Participial phrase: ...looking at him, how can one not remember the horse? (A. Golyandin)
• Standalone application: I called another friend of mine, a very large farmer from Argentina... (A. Tarasov)
• Contact: Aunt Vasya, they left me with a task to redo, and Tanya was waiting for me... (L. Ulitskaya)
• Introductory structures:
  You yourself said that you are my friend. (A. Vampilov)
  But it happens that in the morning you shave, wash, get dressed - look in the mirror - you will be satisfied... (E. Grishkovets)
• Plug-in designs:
  Couldn't you - even if you don't want to - do this for me?

5. Highlight the members of the sentence - that is, establish the syntactic function of the components and make the appropriate underlining. This is the largest section in terms of volume. At this stage you need to be especially careful, because one awkward mistake at the beginning can lead to incorrect syntactic construction and evaluation of a simple structure.

Beginners should do their analysis based on this article or textbook. You can select the material for analysis yourself or take home exercises. Experienced students can peek into theory only where necessary. To consolidate the skill, you need to do several analyzes yourself and then check them. For verification, it is better to contact the teacher, and if this is not possible, do a syntactic analysis of the sentence composition online.

After the grammatical basis, you need to find the members of the sentence of the subject group (that is, those to which the question is asked from the subject) and the predicate group. Each member is emphasized in its own way:

The type of member and the part of speech by which it is expressed are written above the words. Example: with bitterness - a circumstance of a course of action, expressed by a noun. with a preposition in creativity. case.

Parsing complex sentence will not be difficult to master after studying the previous material. The plan is:

1. Select all grammatical bases, count them and determine how many simple parts make up a complex one. There are as many parts as there are basics.
   Dad got on the horse and we rode off. (L. Tolstoy). This complex unit has two simple ones.
2. Find conjunctions and allied words.
   I’m sorry that it’s winter now (O. Mandelstam)– subordinating conjunction “what”.
   When Cherubina exposed herself, Makovsky came to visit her (M. Voloshin)– subordinating conjunction “when”.
   Sleepless nights and half-asleep days flew by, but there was no help from anywhere. (N. Pomyalovsky)– adversative conjunction “but”.
   Unlike conjunctions, allied words will always be full members of the sentence; logical stress may fall on them.
   Russia is converging with the West, which until then was completely alien to it. (A. Khomyakov)
   If you have difficulties in the analysis, you can contact a search engine and analyze the proposal on the Internet for free. But if you have the opportunity to talk to the teacher, it is better to solve the problem this way. There are many difficult places in Russian syntax, which can only be understood in conversation with a teacher.
3. Indicate the meaning of conjunctions and, accordingly, indicate the nature of the connection between the parts. They come in three types:
   Essays consist of two or more equal components: She gave him her hand, and both went along the road to her estate. (I. Turgenev)
   In subordinate clauses, the main and dependent parts are distinguished, while from the first to the second a question is asked and the type of dependent (subordinate) component is determined from it: An hour and a half later I wake up because the sun begins to burn my cheek (M. Voloshin). We ask the question: why do I wake up, for what reason? The type of dependent part is a clause of cause.
   The essence of the non-union is clear from the term itself. Such units lack any lexical means of communication: Koltsov is not only a national poet: no, he stands higher. (V. Belinsky)
4. This stage of syntactic parsing of a complex sentence is relevant only for complex constructions. Its content is to determine the meaning of subordinate clauses.
   I barely had time to put on my cloak when it began to snow (M. Lermontov) - subordinate tense.
   Now a neighbor came running to her wife and said that the old people had gathered at the mosque and wanted to stop you (L. Tolstoy) - explanatory clause.
   The name Morgach also suited him, although he did not blink his eyes more than other people (I. Turgenev) - a subordinate clause.
   The prince did not hear anything further, because the valet began to whisper. (F. Dostoevsky) – subordinate reason.
5. Analysis of each simple component within a complex one.

What is a proposal scheme

The final chord of the analysis is a diagram drawing. It is a graphical representation of basic information: the number of parts, their relationships, means of communication and types of dependent parts.

A drawing is an abstraction of syntactic relations, delimited from specific lexical content. A correctly compiled drawing shows a high understanding of the “Syntax and Punctuation” section and competent mastery of syntactic parsing of a sentence.

Unit boundaries are indicated by square brackets; A period is placed after the closing parenthesis. Homogeneous members in the diagram are circled, and the participial phrase is placed in parentheses.

In a complex scheme, accordingly, two or more parts are distinguished. In the text itself, they are separated by brackets to transfer this mapping into the diagram, and are numbered in order. Only the base is transferred to the diagram. Since you will have to draw a lot, to make the drawing even, use a stencil and a sharpened pencil.

In non-union and complex compounds, only square brackets are used to show the equality of the parts:

For the syntactic analysis of sentences with a main and dependent (dependent) parts, that is, complex constructions, there are two types of schemes - horizontal and vertical:

Syntactic analysis of simple and complex sentences on the Internet

Obviously, such an analysis takes a lot of time and effort and requires certain knowledge and skills. Therefore, many students prefer to do analysis of syntactic structure by composition online. This is a good tool for self-examination, but only if the quality of service deserves respect.

You can do an analysis on the Glavred website (glvrd.ru). The syntax analysis here does not correspond to the school one, but it will tell you the names of the parts of speech and identify some members of the sentence. To use:

1. Paste text into the window on the main page.
2. Select the “Syntax” tab at the top left of the window.
3. Point at the highlighted word and get information in the white field to the right of the window.

Another resource is School Assistant (school-assistant.ru). Its advantage is brevity in the presentation of the material. The path to analysis information is as follows:

1. In the left menu, click “Russian”.
2. Select the desired class (5, 6, 7).
3. Select the section you are interested in.

A brief theoretical reference and tasks will appear on the page, which will be automatically checked after completion. To save results, you need to register in your personal account.

Create a diagram online

Comparing results from different sites with your own analysis will help you check the work of electronic intelligence and choose the best one among them. It is better to contact an online assistant after analyzing and completing the drawing yourself, so that third-party information does not interfere with your training.

You can also understand the structure through linguist forums, where experienced specialists will help you decide controversial issues. It is also better to contact them after some part of the task has already been completed, so that there is a subject for discussion.

Tables and diagrams will also provide great support, in large quantities posted on the Internet. All of these resources and materials will help you create a syntactic analysis (diagram) of a sentence and analyze it according to its composition online for free. The key to success is understanding the theory and regular practice.

Syntactic analysis of a simple sentence has become firmly established in the practice of elementary and high school. This is the most difficult and voluminous type of grammatical analysis. It includes the characteristics and outline of the sentence, analysis by members indicating parts of speech.

The structure and meaning of a simple sentence is studied starting from the 5th grade. The full set of features of a simple sentence is indicated in the 8th grade, and in the 9th grade the focus is on complex sentences.

In this type of analysis, the levels of morphology and syntax are correlated: the student must be able to identify parts of speech, recognize their forms, find conjunctions, understand how words are connected in a phrase, know the signs of the main and minor members of a sentence.

Let's start with the simplest thing: we will help the children prepare for parsing in 5th grade. In elementary school, the student remembers the sequence of analysis and performs it on elementary level, indicating the grammatical basis, syntactic connections between words, the type of sentence according to the composition and purpose of the statement, learns to draw up diagrams and find homogeneous members.

In elementary schools, different Russian language programs are used, so the level of requirements and student preparation are different. In the fifth grade, I took in children who studied in elementary school under the programs of the educational system "School 2100", "School of Russia" and "Primary School of the 21st Century". There are big differences. Teachers primary school They do a tremendous amount of work to compensate for the shortcomings of their textbooks, and they themselves “create” continuity between primary and secondary schools.

In grade 5, the material on sentence analysis is generalized, expanded and built into a more complete form; in grades 6-7 it is improved taking into account newly learned morphological units ( verb forms: participle and gerund; adverb and state category; function words: prepositions, conjunctions and particles).

Let us show with examples the differences between the level of requirements in the parsing format.

Plan for parsing a simple sentence

1. Determine the type of sentence according to the purpose of the statement (narrative, interrogative, incentive).

2. Find out the type of sentence by emotional coloring (non-exclamatory or exclamatory).

3. Find the grammatical basis of the sentence, underline it and indicate the methods of expression, indicate that the sentence is simple.

4. Determine the composition of the main members of the proposal (two-part or one-part).

5. Determine the presence of minor members (common or non-common).

6. Emphasize the minor members of the sentence, indicate the ways of expressing them (parts of speech): from the composition of the subject and the composition of the predicate.

7. Determine the presence of missing members of the sentence (complete or incomplete).

8. Determine the presence of a complication (complicated or not complicated).

9. Write down the characteristics of the proposal.

10. Create an outline of the proposal.

For analysis, we used sentences from Sergei Kozlov’s wonderful fairy tales about the Hedgehog and the Little Bear.

1) It was an extraordinary autumn day!

2) Everyone’s duty is to work.

3) Thirty mosquitoes ran out into the clearing and began to play their squeaky violins.

4) He has neither a father, nor a mother, nor a Hedgehog, nor a Bear.

5) And Belka took some nuts and a cup and hurried after.

6) And they put things in a basket: mushrooms, honey, a teapot, cups - and went to the river.

7) Pine needles, fir cones, and even cobwebs - they all straightened up, smiled and began to sing with all their might the last autumn song of the grass.

8) The Hedgehog lay, covered up to his nose with a blanket, and looked at the Little Bear with quiet eyes.

9) The hedgehog sat on a hill under a pine tree and looked at the moonlit valley, flooded with fog.

10) Across the river, the forest was dark, blazing with aspens.

11) So until the evening they ran, jumped, jumped off the cliff and screamed at the top of their lungs, setting off the stillness and silence of the autumn forest.

12) And he jumped like a real kangaroo.

13) Water, where are you running?

14) Maybe he's gone crazy?

15) It seems to me that he imagined himself... as the wind.

Examples of parsing simple sentences

§1. What is syntactic parsing, what are its specifics?

Parsing- this is a complete grammatical characteristic of a syntactic unit:

• phrases
• simple sentence
• complex sentence

When performing syntactic analysis, it is important to be able to distinguish between units of syntax, to realize that these are units of different levels, and to understand what features characterize each of them. Syntactic analysis requires not to confuse a phrase and a simple sentence, as well as a simple and complex sentence, and to know how to parse each of them.

§2. What you need to know and be able to do

Parsing requires knowledge and skills.

Need to know:

• what is the difference between a phrase and a sentence
• what is the difference between a simple and complex sentence
• how a phrase is constructed, and what they are like (type by main word)
• syntactic connections of words in a phrase: agreement, control, adjacency
• what features characterize a sentence: the purpose of the utterance, semantic and intonation completeness, the presence of a grammatical basis
• what are the sentences based on the number of grammatical bases: simple, complex
• what are they like simple sentences according to its structure: two-part, one-part (nominal, definite-personal, indefinite-personal, generalized-personal, impersonal)
• what are the types of complex sentences: according to the nature of the syntactic connection of their parts: allied, non-union; allied: complex and complex)
• what is syntactic role words in a sentence (parsing by sentence members)

You need to be able to:

• determine which syntactic units the unit given for analysis belongs to
• highlight phrases in a sentence
• find the main and dependent word in a phrase
• determine the type of syntactic connection
• determine the grammatical basis of a sentence
• determine the type of sentence by its grammatical basis (two-part - one-part) and by the nature of the main member (for one-part sentences)
• define sentence members
• identify complicating components: homogeneous members, isolations, introductory elements (introductory words and sentences, inserted structures), addresses, direct speech and citation
• determine the number of parts in a complex sentence
• determine the type of syntactic connection and the type of complex sentence

§3. The order of parsing syntactic units

Collocation

1. Determine the main and dependent words, highlight the main thing, and from it raise a question to the dependent one.
2. Determine the type of phrase based on the main word: noun, verb, adverb.
3. Determine the type of syntactic connection: coordination, control, adjacency.

Simple sentence

1. Perform an analysis of the members of the sentence: underline all the members of the sentence, determine by what (word, what part of speech) they are expressed.
2. Give a description of the purpose of the statement:

• narrative
• interrogative
• incentive

3. Describe the emotions and intonation expressed:

• non-exclamatory
• exclamation point

4. Determine the number of grammatical bases and determine the type of sentence by their number:

• simple
• complex

5. Describe the presence of main members:

• two-part
• one-piece

a) one-part with the main member subject: nominative
b) one-part with the main member predicate: definite-personal, indefinite-personal, generalized-personal, impersonal

6. Describe the presence of minor members:

• common
• not widespread

7. Characterize it in terms of completeness (the presence of sentence members necessary in meaning):

• complete
• incomplete

8. Determine the presence of complicating components:

• uncomplicated
• complicated:

a) homogeneous members of the sentence
b) dissociated members: definition (agreed - uncoordinated), addition, circumstance
c) introductory words, introductory sentences and plug-in constructions
d) appeal
e) constructions with direct speech or quotation

Note:

When expressing distinctions by participles and participial phrases, and also comparative designs, characterize how exactly the isolation is expressed

Complex sentence

1. As in a simple sentence, identify the members of the sentence.
2. As in a simple sentence, characterize the purpose of the statement:

• narrative
• interrogative
• incentive

3. As in a simple sentence, describe the emotions and intonation expressed:

• non-exclamatory
• exclamation point

4. Based on the number of grammatical stems (more than one), determine that the sentence is complex.
5. Determine the type of syntactic connection between the parts of a complex sentence:

• with union connection
• with non-union connection
• with a combination of union and non-union connections

6. Determine the type of complex sentence and means of communication:

• compound (: connecting, dividing, adversative, connecting, explanatory or gradational)
• complex (: temporary, causal, conditional, target, consequence, concessive, comparative and explanatory, as well as allied words)
• non-union (connection in meaning, expressed intonation)

7. Determine the type of complex sentence (for example: a complex sentence with an explanatory clause).
8. Next, each part of a complex sentence is characterized (according to the scheme of a simple sentence - see the scheme for parsing a simple sentence, paragraphs 5-8)
9. Create a diagram of a complex sentence that reflects

Words and phrases are the components of every sentence in writing and speaking. To construct it, you must clearly understand what the connection should be between them in order to construct a grammatically correct statement. That is why one of the important and complex topics in the Russian language school curriculum is the syntactic analysis of sentences. With this analysis, a complete analysis of all components of the statement is carried out and the connection between them is established. In addition, determining the structure of a sentence allows you to correctly place punctuation marks in it, which is quite important for every literate person. As a rule, this topic begins with the analysis of simple phrases, and after that children are taught to parse sentences.

Rules for parsing phrases

Analyzing a specific phrase taken from context is relatively simple in the Russian syntax section. In order to produce it, they determine which of the words is the main word and which is the dependent one, and determine which part of speech each of them belongs to. Next, it is necessary to determine the syntactic relationship between these words. There are three of them in total:

• Agreement is a kind of subordinating relationship in which the gender, number and case for all elements of the phrase are determined by the main word. For example: a moving train, a flying comet, a shining sun.
• Control is also one of the types of subordinating connections; it can be strong (when the case connection of words is necessary) and weak (when the case of the dependent word is not predetermined). For example: watering flowers - watering from a watering can; liberation of the city - liberation by the army.
• Adjunction is also a subordinating type of connection, but it applies only to words that are unchangeable and not inflected by case. Such words express dependence only by meaning. For example: riding a horse, unusually sad, very scared.

An example of syntactic parsing of phrases

The syntactic analysis of the phrase should look something like this: “speaks beautifully”; the main word is “speaks”, the dependent word is “beautiful”. This connection is determined through the question: speaks (how?) beautifully. The word “says” is used in the present tense in the singular and third person. The word “beautifully” is an adverb, and therefore this phrase expresses a syntactic connection - adjacency.

Parsing diagram for a simple sentence

Parsing a sentence is a bit like parsing a phrase. It consists of several stages that will allow you to study the structure and relationship of all its components:

1. First of all, the purpose of uttering a single sentence is determined; they are all divided into three types: narrative, interrogative and exclamatory, or incentive. Each of them has its own sign. So, at the end of a narrative sentence telling about an event, there is a period; after the question, naturally, there is a question mark, and at the end of the incentive - an exclamation mark.
2. Next, you should highlight the grammatical basis of the sentence - subject and predicate.
3. The next stage is a description of the structure of the sentence. It can be one-part with one of the main members or two-part with a full grammatical basis. In the first case, you additionally need to indicate what kind of sentence the nature of the grammatical basis is: verbal or denominative. And then determine whether there are secondary members in the structure of the statement, and indicate whether it is common or not. At this stage you should also indicate whether the sentence is complicated. Complications include homogeneous members, addresses, phrases and introductory words.
4. Further, the syntactic analysis of the sentence involves the analysis of all words according to their belonging to parts of speech, gender, number and case.
5. The final stage is an explanation of the punctuation marks in the sentence.

Example of parsing a simple sentence

Theory is theory, but without practice you cannot consolidate a single topic. That is why the school curriculum spends a lot of time on syntactic analysis of phrases and sentences. And for training you can take the simplest sentences. For example: “The girl was lying on the beach and listening to the surf.”

1. The sentence is declarative and non-exclamatory.
2. The main parts of the sentence: girl - subject, lay, listened - predicates.
3. This proposal is two-part, complete and widespread. Homogeneous predicates act as complications.
4. Parsing all the words of the sentence:

• “girl” - acts as the subject and is a feminine noun in the singular and nominative case;
• “lay” - in a sentence it is a predicate, refers to verbs, has a feminine gender, singular and past tense;
• “na” is a preposition, used to connect words;
• “beach” - answers the question “where?” and is a circumstance in a sentence expressed by a masculine noun in prepositional case and singular;
• “and” is a conjunction used to connect words;
• “listened” is the second predicate, a feminine verb in the past tense and singular;
• “surf” is an object in a sentence, refers to a noun, is masculine, singular and used in the accusative case.

Identification of sentence parts in writing

When parsing phrases and sentences, conditional underscores are used to indicate that words belong to one or another member of the sentence. So, for example, the subject is underlined with one line, the predicate with two, the definition is indicated with a wavy line, the complement with a dotted line, the circumstance with a dotted line. In order to correctly determine which member of the sentence is in front of us, we should pose a question to it from one of the parts of the grammatical basis. For example, the definition answers the questions of the adjective, the complement is determined by the questions of indirect cases, the circumstance indicates the place, time and reason and answers the questions: “where?” "where?" and "why?"

Parsing a complex sentence

The procedure for parsing a complex sentence is slightly different from the examples above, and therefore should not cause any particular difficulties. However, everything must be in order, and therefore the teacher complicates the task only after the children have learned to parse simple sentences. To carry out the analysis, a complex statement is proposed that has several grammatical bases. And here you should adhere to the following scheme:

1. First, the purpose of the statement and the emotional coloring are determined.
2. Next, the grammatical bases in the sentence are highlighted.
3. The next step is to define the connection, which can be done with or without a conjunction.
4. Next, you should indicate by what connection the two grammatical bases in the sentence are connected. These can be intonation, as well as coordinating or subordinating conjunctions. And immediately conclude what the sentence is: complex, complex or non-union.
5. The next stage of parsing is the syntactic analysis of the sentence into its parts. It is produced according to the scheme for a simple sentence.
6. At the end of the analysis, you should construct a diagram of the sentence, on which the connection of all its parts will be visible.

Connecting parts of a complex sentence

As a rule, to connect parts in complex sentences, conjunctions and allied words are used, which must be preceded by a comma. Such proposals are called allied. They are divided into two types:

• Compound sentences joined by conjunctions a, and, or, then, but. As a rule, both parts in such a statement are equal. For example: “The sun was shining, but the clouds were floating.”
• Complex sentences that use the following conjunctions and allied words: so that, how, if, where, whither, since, although and others. In such sentences, one part always depends on the other. For example: "The sun's rays will fill the room as soon as the cloud passes."

When working with various texts, many people need to parse a sentence according to its composition. Carrying out such analysis usually presupposes that a person has appropriate philological knowledge that can help in the correct analysis of the text he needs. At the same time, there are also services on the network that perform sentence parsing operations online. After thoroughly studying the rules for analyzing different composition proposals, I decided to present all my findings in this article.

At the beginning, I note that the expression “parsing a sentence by composition” is somewhat incorrect, since words are usually parsed by composition, and what interests us in this case is called “syntactic parsing of a sentence.”

In this case, the specified syntactic parsing (at school it is also called “parsing by members”) is usually performed as follows:

• Decide which sentence you are analyzing based on the purpose of its statement (declarative, interrogative or motivating in nature);
• Indicate the emotional coloring of the sentence (is it exclamatory or non-exclamatory);
• Mark the number of grammatical stems in this sentence (if the sentence is simple - then one stem, if complex - two or more);

If the sentence is simple:

Example of a simple sentence:

“It was an extraordinary autumn day!”

Having carried out a syntactic analysis, we can see that this sentence is declarative, exclamatory, simple, two-part, complete, and not complicated.

If the sentence is complex:

• Decide on the connection in a complex sentence - union or non-union;
• Indicate the connection used in the sentence - intonation, subordinating, coordinating;
• Indicate the type of complex sentence - non-conjunctive, complex, complex.

Example of a complex sentence:

“The bouquet included roses and lilies, but she liked tulips better.”

Having carried out a syntactic analysis of this sentence, we can see that this sentence is of a narrative nature, not exclamatory, complex, has a conjunction, and is complex. The first sentence here is two-part, the grammatical basis is the words “there were roses and lilies”, it is common, and is complicated by homogeneous subjects.

The second sentence in this complex sentence is two-part, its grammatical basis is the words “liked tulips”, the sentence is common and not complicated.

Services for analyzing proposals by composition online

Due to the richness of grammatical structures and the complexity of creating a powerful network tool for syntactic text analysis, the services presented on the network (of which there are few) have rather weak capabilities for conducting a full syntactic parsing of sentences. However, I would highlight the following resources:

Seosin.ru

Among the Russian-language resources for conducting semantic analysis online (de facto they are practically not represented), I would highlight the seosin.ru service. It allows you to identify syntactic and morphological errors, demonstrates the general associativity of the text, and performs other types of analysis. Unfortunately, the service does not always work stably; dysfunctions are often observed in its operation.

1. To work with this service, go to seosin.ru.
2. Enter your proposal in the appropriate window and click on “Analyze”.

Lexisrex.com

For lovers English language The powerful linguistic resource lexisrex.com can help with parsing. Its capabilities make it possible to analyze a proposal by its members. However, this site also contains other auxiliary tools for implementing various types linguistic analysis online.

1. To use this resource, log in to lexisrex.com.
2. Paste your proposal into the appropriate window and click on the “Analyze” button.

Linguist forums

When parsing sentences online, you can turn to the help of the “human factor” and go to various linguist forums (level gramota.turbotext.ru, rusforus.ru and analogues). Register there, ask your question, and they will definitely help you.

Conclusion

Network resources that allow you to analyze proposals by composition are rather scarce, which is associated with the difficulties of creating such resources. However, there are several such tools online (most of them are in English) that make it easy to carry out the text analysis we need. Use the functionality of these services to analyze necessary proposals, and perform parsing online.