The emergence of ecotourism. History of the development of ecological tourism. Trends in ecotourism development

CHAPTER L ECOLOGICAL TOURISM: ESSENCE AND 19 THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS

1.1. Concept, types, organizational structure of eco-tourism j ^

1.2. Specially protected natural areas (SPNA) as objects of ecotourism

1.3. History of the development of ecological tourism in protected areas of Russia

CHAPTER IL PROSPECTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT

TOURISM IN UDMURTIA

2.1. State of eco-tour and historical resources of Udmurtia

2.2. Ecological camps as a form of activity of environmental organizations

2.3 Prospects for the development of ecological tourism using the example of the Nechkinsky National Park

Recommended list of dissertations

  • Formation of an organizational and economic mechanism for managing the development of ecological tourism: using the example of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic 2012, Candidate of Economic Sciences Baysultanova, Leila Borisovna

  • Organizational and economic mechanism for the rational use of the region’s natural resource base: based on materials from the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic 2009, Candidate of Economic Sciences Baysultanova, Leila Borisovna

  • Development of a mechanism for managing the development of ecotourism in specially protected natural areas 2002, Candidate of Economic Sciences Shmeleva, Tatyana Vladimirovna

  • Assessment of the natural resource potential of the Belgorod region for the development of ecological tourism 2010, Candidate of Geographical Sciences Kholodova, Rimma Anatolyevna

  • Cultural landscapes of the Russian North and opportunities for the development of eco-cultural tourism: the example of Kenozersky National Park 2008, candidate of cultural studies Arsenyeva, Elena Ivanovna

Introduction of the dissertation (part of the abstract) on the topic “History of the formation and development of ecological tourism in Russia at the turn of the XX-XXI centuries: using the example of the Udmurt Republic”

Relevance of the study.

The most promising research of an international nature includes the study of tourism as a sociocultural phenomenon. Since tourism has become an integral factor in social development, it can be considered as an object of historical research. Tourism has long been considered one of the most profitable and rapidly developing sectors of the world economy. But every year the negative aspects of mass tourism become more and more obvious.

In the 80s XX century A new form of tourism began to take shape - ecological tourism, ecotourism, the purpose of which is environmental education and promotion of the conservation of nature and local culture. The development of ecotourism in the world is closely connected with the formation of a system of specially protected natural areas (SPNA) - natural reserves, national parks, and natural monuments. Today, ecotourism plays a significant role in the global tourism industry. According to experts from the World Tourism Organization (WTO), in the 21st century. The growth rate of ecotourism will continue to be high, and the revenue generated will make a significant contribution to the development of the economies of many countries around the world, especially developing ones.1

Russia has vast territories with untouched nature. On the territory of Udmurtia there are also ecotourism sites: national and natural parks, natural monuments. Identifying the features and problems of ecotourism in Udmurtia is relevant both for the development of tourism in the republic and for the economy of Udmurtia as a whole. The relevance of the study is also due to the fact that ecotourism has not been singled out as an independent subject of study at the regional level.

The object of the study is ecotourism in Russia and its regional aspect.

The subject of the study is the history of the formation and development of ecological tourism in Udmurtia.

Research into the problem begins in the 1980s. The concept of “ecological tourism” appeared in world practice and in Russia, and therefore in Udmurtia, only at this time. The development of ecotourism is closely related to the emergence of national parks. The first national parks in Russia were formed in 1983. The largest number of them appeared in the 1990s. In 1995, the Federal Law “On Specially Protected Natural Areas” was adopted, which is still in force today, providing the legislative basis for developing management policies for Russian parks. If we talk about Udmurtia, then in 1994 a commission was created to form a unified network of specially protected natural areas of the republic. In order to restore the disturbed ecological balance, on December 18, 1995, the Government of Udmurtia adopted a resolution “On the Protected Natural Areas Scheme.” The only national park of the Urals was formed in 1997.

The upper limit of the study is determined to be 2005 on the following grounds: in 2005, a new program for the socio-economic development of the Udmurt Republic for 2005-2009 began to operate, and the following regulatory documents expired: “List of state natural reserves and national natural parks, recommended for organization on the territory of the Russian Federation in 1994 - 2005" and "Concept for the development of tourism in the Russian Federation for the period until 2005".2

The degree of scientific development of the topic. The literature on the topic under study can be divided into two groups. The first consists of domestic and foreign studies devoted to theoretical issues of tourism in general and ecotourism in particular. The second group includes scientific works of a regional nature. A.Yu. pays great attention to the development of international tourism in his works. Alexandrova. Among the main theorists of tourism one can name such researchers as V.A. Kvartalnov, A.D. Chudnovsky, N.I. Kabushkin, B.S. Senin.3

The historiography of ecological tourism and related conservation work can be divided into two stages. At the first stage, in pre-revolutionary and Soviet historiography, the origins of conservation and the organization of protected natural areas in Russia are considered. At the second stage, works devoted directly to ecotourism appear.

Stage 1 - first floor. XX century Research devoted to conservation and nature conservation in general appeared at the beginning of the 20th century. Here we can name the works of V.I. Taliev, A.G. Kozhevnikova, I.P. Borodina, P.E. Vasilkovsky, D.K. Solovyova, G.A. Bryzgalina, B.A. Zakharova. These works examined the types of protected natural areas and made recommendations for their conservation. He talks in detail about the activities and origins of the environmental movement and conservation in Soviet Russia in his book D.R. Weiner (Weiner).4

Stage 2 - end of the 20th century. to the present time. Interest in the study of ecotourism began to actively increase in the second half of the 20th century, after the development of the mass model of tourism led to the aggravation of negative socio-economic processes in the territories of popular holiday destinations as a result of a significant deterioration in their ecological condition. There is a need to rethink the principles that determine the further development of tourism. Due to its natural basis, ecotourism was most consistent with the principles of the concept of sustainable tourism development that had begun to take shape. The theoretical basis and conceptual apparatus of ecotourism are currently only being created5. Therefore, the historiography of the problem covers mainly the modern stage. First of all, we should mention the works of such founders of ecotourism as Jungk and Tseballos-Lascourien. Many foreign studies are devoted to the problems of the current state and activities of protected areas, in particular national parks (NPs). K. Bichon, M. Green, A. Phillins in their work “Models of National Parks” (2000) provide characteristics of national park systems in Europe and Canada 6.

Since this dissertation research is devoted to Russian ecotourism, we will consider in more detail the works of domestic researchers. In our country, the term “ecotourism” was first used in 1985, when the Irkutsk bureau of international youth tourism “Sputnik” offered an ecotour “On the Circum-Baikal Railway”7 on the all-Union tourist market. A great contribution to the study of ecotourism in Russia was made by A.V. Drozdov, T.K. Sergeeva, V.V. Khrabovchenko, A.I. Eitingon. A.I. Eitingon in his work “Ecological Tourism” reveals the theoretical basis of ecotourism and identifies its types and forms. S.K. Sergeeva characterizes the regions of the world from the point of view of the development of ecotourism. V.V. Khrabovchenko analyzes foreign experience in the development of ecotourism, identifies the principles of its development and gives recommendations for the effective involvement of specially protected natural areas in ecotourism activities8.

Several conferences dedicated to eco-tourism and sustainable development of regions were organized in Russia. Since the early 1990s. Irkutsk scientists have increasingly become interested in issues of ecological tourism. A series of Russian-German ecotourism conferences took place in Berlin and Lake Baikal. Under the auspices of the Russian International Academy of Tourism, an international scientific conference “The Baikal Region and Mongolia as Components of the World Ecotourism Market” was organized in 2002. Two international scientific and practical conferences “Tourism, ecology and sustainable development of regions” were held in the Tver region in 2003 and 2005. During the work of these conferences, collections of generalizing works were published and recommendations were developed for the further development of ecological tourism in Russia.

Of great importance for considering the history of Russian national parks and their current state were publications published with the assistance of the Center for Wildlife Conservation; “Strategy for the management of national parks of Russia” (M., 2002), N.V. Maksakovsky “Development of the NGT network in Russia” (M., 2002), M. Yu. Travkina “Regulated tourism and recreation in national parks” (M., 2002), etc.10

National parks of Russia and the features of their functioning are considered in the works of such authors as V.P. Chizhova, N.M. Zabelina, V.B. Stepanitsky, Yu.A. Isakov, F.R. Shtilmark, Yu.A. Vedenin, B.V. Veseliy, A.A. Tishkov, A.A. Traninin, N.V. Maksakovsky, S.V. Nikolaev, N.F. Reimers et al. These studies were of great importance for characterizing national parks as ecotourism sites,11

An analysis of domestic research in the field of ecotourism shows that most of them are devoted to the economic and geographical aspects of the functioning of ecotourism. The process of formation and development of ecotourism is not fully considered.

Studies of regional historiography are also devoted to the problems of tourism development. Issues of tourism and local history are quite fully covered in the works of researchers and local historians of Udmurtia. Among the works on local history of Udmurtia one can name the works of the following authors: E.F. Shumilova, A.D. Efremova, I.I. Kobzeva, A.V. Novikova; in geography - works by S.I. Shirobokova, A.P. Perevoshchikov. You can also name several guidebooks and reference publications: “Guide to the Urals”; “Volga region: nature, life, economy: Guide to the Volga, Oka, Kama, Vyatka and Belaya”; “Volga region: Directory-guide to the Volga, Kama, Oka and their navigable tributaries for 1930”; Information guide. “To help tour and travel leaders, dedicated to the 90th anniversary of the birth of V.I. Lenin and the 40th anniversary of the Udm. ASSR"; In the native land: Historical and cultural sights of Udmurtia.12

On the basis of the Institute of Social Communications (ISK) of Udmurt State University under the Department of Theory and Practice of Social Communications, a center has been created to study resources for the development of tourism and socio-cultural activities in the Udmurt Republic. On this topic, candidate's dissertations, final qualification papers, coursework are defended, and scientific Olympiads are held. There is also a Center for Tourism and Education ISK, which provides excursions and trips for students around Udmurtia.

The problems of the history of tourism and excursion business in Udmurtia are dealt with by Candidate of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor L.V. Batalova. Udmurt State University publishes articles and collections of materials devoted to the problems of tourism development in the Udmurt Republic. Collections dedicated to tourism resources of Udmurtia are being prepared for publication.13

An analysis of the historiography of this topic shows that the problems of the development of ecological tourism in Russia in general and in Udmurtia in particular during the designated chronological period have not yet been sufficiently studied by domestic historical science; There are no works that allow us to present a holistic picture of the development of ecological tourism in Udmurtia.

The purpose of the study is to analyze the process of formation and development of ecological tourism in Russia and its regional aspect using the example of Udmurtia. In accordance with the goal, the following tasks are defined:

1. Define the concept of “ecological tourism”, identify its organizational structure.

2. Consider protected areas as objects of ecological tourism, explore the emergence of national parks and the development of ecological tourism in world practice.

3. Trace the history of the development of ecological tourism in world practice, in Russia and Udmurtia.

4. Study the state of environmental and tourism resources of Udmurtia.

Source base of the research.

State Archives of the Russian Federation, Federal Forestry Service. Rosleskhoz Foundation - annual reports of state national parks (NP).

Central State Archive of the Udmurt Republic: fund R-304 - Udmurt Regional Council for Tourism and Excursions; fund R-1254 -Republican station for young tourists; fund R-1495 - Udmurt Republican Council of the All-Russian Society for Nature Conservation.

Center for Documentation of the Contemporary History of the Udmurt Republic: fund No. 63 of the Rodniki Regional Public Educational Institution; Fund No. 70 UMOO "Shundy".

Archive of the State Council of the UR: fund R-620, Supreme Council of the UR of the XII convocation, Oct. 1991 - Apr. 1995; State Council Fund of the 1st convocation, April 1995 - April 1999

Current archive of the Department of Protected Natural Areas of the Russian Federation: annual reports of the NP for 2003.

Current archive of the Ministry of Natural Resources of the UR: Scheme of organization and development of the Nechkinsky National Park in 7 volumes, questionnaire of the Sharkan natural park.

Current archives of various organizations: RMDOO "Union of Tourists and Local Historians of Udmurtia": reports on the activities of the "Union of Tourists and Local Historians of Udmurtia"; URS VOOP: reports on the activities of URS VOOP; RDOO "Rodniki": reports on the activities of RDOO "Rodniki"; Eco-Union: reports on the activities of the Ecological Union of Udmurtia for 1997, 1998; NP "Nechkinsky".

Printed sources from the collections of the Russian State Library in Moscow and the National Library of the Udmurt Republic (Izhevsk) were used. These funds were of great importance both for understanding the history of the formation and development of ecological tourism in Russia as a whole, and for obtaining data on the state, functioning and development trends of regional ecological tourism in the 1990s. Scientific publications, conference collections, and reference materials were used .

Also important were the materials of dissertation research on the problems of ecological tourism: Moroz I.M. Excursion and tourism activities in protected areas; Tikhonova I.V. Economy of ecological tourism on Lake Baikal: problems and development paths; Zhang Guangsheng. Eco-tourism and its role in the conservation of protected natural areas (on the example of the Changbai Mountain Nature Reserve, Jilin Province, China).

To consider the situation in regional ecotourism, a large number of newspaper and magazine articles on the subject of the study were used. Questions about protected areas of the Udmurt Republic, about the activities of environmental organizations, about the natural resources of Udmurtia were covered by journalists in publications of periodicals (“Izvestia of the Udmurt Republic”, “Udmurtskaya Pravda”), in newspapers (“Udmurtia Week”, “AiF in Udmurtia”),

To describe the protected areas of the Udmurt Republic, annual state reports on the state of the natural environment in the Udmurt Republic played an important role.

The next group of sources are official documents of Russia and the Udmurt Republic. The dissertation research used regulatory documents that legally support the activities of specially protected natural areas.

In addition, the dissertation used data obtained as a result of sociological research on the topic of the dissertation research, conducted in 2002-2004. in Udmurtia by the PR agency ISK, as well as materials from conversations with representatives of public environmental organizations, the Nechkinsky National Park, and employees of ministries and departments.

The official websites of various environmental organizations supporting eco-tourism and national park websites were viewed on the Internet.

Methodology and research methods. The diversity of the topic under study predetermined the use of an interdisciplinary approach as a methodological basis. The stated topic is at the intersection of different disciplines: history, economics, geography, sociology.

The historical nature of the study is based on the principles of historicism and scientific objectivity, as well as analysis of facts, which involves the study of historical phenomena in the process of development and interrelation, taking into account the specific historical conditions of their occurrence. These principles determined the use of a set of general scientific (analysis, synthesis, deduction) and special scientific (historical-genetic, comparative-historical, historical-typological, historical-systemic, problem-chronological) research methods. Their integrated use allows obtaining results that complement each other.

The study also used sociological methods: participant observation, interviews and questionnaires. The objectives of these methods were to obtain information on the research topic, as well as to identify the opinions of interlocutors on specific issues.

The scientific novelty of the study is that it:

Introduces into scientific circulation a new layer of empirical material on the development of ecological tourism in the Udmurt Republic, systematizes and generalizes the studied material;

Complements existing scientific research on the history of tourism development in Russia and the Udmurt Republic;

Traces the formation and development of ecological tourism in Russia and Udmurtia in the context of a changing socio-economic environment, determines general trends and specifics of development.

The practical significance of the work is determined by the possibility of using the results obtained in conducting further scientific research and preparing general works on the history of ecological tourism in the Udmurt Republic.

The dissertation research materials can be used by teachers and university students as part of training courses on local history, history of tourism, eco-tourism, and ecology. The use of this study is especially relevant for training personnel for the tourism industry of the republic, future specialists receiving higher education in the specialty “Socio-cultural service and tourism” at Udmurt State University.

In addition, the study may be of interest to managers of government agencies involved in eco-tourism in the SD, managers and specialists in ecotourism in specially protected natural areas (in particular, practical recommendations for the Nechkinsky NP). The results obtained will help develop strategies and tactics in activities on development of ecological tourism in the republic.

Approbation of research results. The main provisions of the dissertation research are presented in 16 scientific publications, including 12 articles. Certain provisions and conclusions of the study were discussed at international, all-Russian and regional conferences: VI International Scientific and Practical Conference “Tourism: Personnel Training, Problems and Development Prospects” (March 22-23, 2004, Moscow); I and II international scientific and practical conferences “Tourism, ecology and sustainable development of regions” (2003 and 2005, Tver); All-Russian scientific conference “Modern global and regional changes in geosystems” (2004, Kazan); regional scientific and technical conference “Light industry. Service. Scientific research of graduate students and young scientists of universities of the Volga Federal District" (September 23-25, 2003, Samara); regional scientific and practical conference “Russian tourism business: problems and prospects” (September 16-17, 2003, Omsk); scientific and practical conference “Development of professional hospitality in the Russian Federation: problems and solutions. Regional aspect", (April 29-30, 2004, Perm); regional scientific and practical conference “Problems of the development of domestic tourism in Central Russia: education, management, planning” (November 30-December 3, 2005, Yaroslavl). Also, the dissertation research materials were discussed at various conferences held on the basis of ISK and Udmurt State University.

The main provisions of the dissertation were used in the preparation of training courses “Ecological foundations of environmental management”, “Recreational resource science”, “Ecological tourism”, “Tourism activities in Udmurtia” for the specialty “Socio-cultural service and tourism” and were used in the educational process of ISK.

The structure of the dissertation meets its goals and objectives and includes an introduction, two chapters divided into six paragraphs, a conclusion, a list of sources and literature, and appendices. The introduction substantiates the relevance, purpose and objectives of the study, examines the historiography of the problem, the source base and the practical significance of the study. The first chapter examines the theoretical aspects of ecological tourism and its development in world and Russian practice. The second chapter characterizes the state and prospects of ecotourism in Udmurtia and gives practical recommendations for its development. The conclusion provides the main conclusions from the study. The list of sources and literature contains 268 titles. The appendix contains tables, diagrams, and photographs.

Similar dissertations in the specialty "Domestic History", 07.00.02 code VAK

  • Ecological and tourist zoning of Russia 2006, Candidate of Geographical Sciences Basanets, Larisa Pavlovna

  • Management of ecotourism in Russian regions 2010, Candidate of Economic Sciences Gusanov, Alexander Anatolyevich

  • The role of ecological tourism in the creation of a tourist and recreational special economic zone 2009, Candidate of Economic Sciences Nikiforova, Lina Yurievna

  • Analysis of the state of systems of specially protected natural areas of the regions and development of recommendations for their multi-purpose use: Using the example of eco-tourism in St. Petersburg and the Leningrad region 2005, Candidate of Agricultural Sciences Odintsova, Natalya Andreevna

  • Ecological and geographical basis for the functioning and prospects for the development of specially protected natural areas of Northern Mongolia 2011, Doctor of Geographical Sciences Baastyn Oyuungerel

List of references for dissertation research Candidate of Historical Sciences Pimenova, Ekaterina Leonidovna, 2006

2. Central State Archive of the Udmurt Republic: Fund R-304 Udmurt Regional Council for Tourism and Excursions. Fund R-1254 - Republican station for young tourists.

3. Fund R-1495 Udmurt Republican Council of the All-Russian Society for Nature Conservation

4. Documentation Center for the Contemporary History of the Urals:

5. Fund No. 63 RDOO “Rodniki”. Fund No. 70 UMOPO "Shundy".4. Archive of the State Council of the Urals:

6. Fund R-620, op. 1 Supreme Council of the 12th convocation, Oct. 1991, April 1995. Fund op.1 State Council of the UR 1st convocation, April 1995 - April 1999

7. Current archive of the Ministry of Natural Resources of the UR:

8. Scheme of organization and development of the Nechkinsky National Park in 7 volumes.

9. Questionnaire for the Sharkan Natural Park.

10. Current archive of the RMDOO “Union of Tourists and Local Historians of Udmurtia”: Reports on the activities of the “Union of Tourists and Local Historians of Udmurtia”.

11. Current archive of URS VOOP: Reports on the activities of URS VOOP.

12. Current archive of the RDOO “Rodniki”: Reports on the activities of the RDOO “Rodniki”. 10. Current Eco Union archive:

13. Reports on the activities of the Ecological Union of Udmurtia for 1997, 1998.

14. Current archive of the Nechkinsky NP.

15. Park organization scheme, activity reports.1. Published sources

16. Constitution of the Russian Federation (adopted by popular vote on December 12, 1993). Art. 72. // SPS "Garant".

17. Concept for the development of tourism in the Russian Federation for the period until 2005 (approved by order of the Government of the Russian Federation of July 11, 2002 N 954-r) // SPS “Garant”.

18. Forest Code of the Russian Federation (adopted by the State Duma of the Russian Federation on January 22, 1997) // ATP “Garant”.

19. On public associations: Federal Law of the Russian Federation of 1995 // SZ RF. 1995. -№27. - Article 2503.

20. On the fundamentals of tourism activities in the Russian Federation (as amended and supplemented on January 10, 2003, August 22, 2004): Federal Law of November 24, 1996 N 132-F3 // SPS “Garant”.

21. On specially protected natural areas: Federal Law of March 14, 1995 No. 33 FZ (as amended by Federal Law of December 30, 2001 No. 196-FZ) // SPS “Garant”.

23. On the allocation of a land plot to the Physico-Technical Institute of the Ural Branch of the USSR Academy of Sciences for the location of the “Udmurt Botanical Garden”: Resolution of the Presidium of the Zavyalovsky District Council No. 412 dated January 14, 1991 // Current archive of the State Council of the Urals.

24. On the protection of atmospheric air: Federal Law of May 4, 1999 N 96-FZ (as amended on August 22, 2004) // SPS “Garant”.

25. On environmental protection: Federal Law of January 10, 2002 N 7-FZ (as amended on August 22, December 29, 2004) // SPS “Garant”.

26. On approval of the Regulations on the NP of the Russian Federation: Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of August 10, 1993 No. 769 // “Collection of acts of the President and Government of the Russian Federation.” 1993 No. 34. Art. 3180.

27. On the environmental extra-budgetary fund of the Udmurt Republic: Resolution of the Presidium of the Supreme Council of the UR dated May 31, 1994 N 1145-HI (as amended on February 8, 2000) // SPS “Garant”.

28. On the budget of the Udmurt Republic for 2002: Law of the UR dated December 24, 2001 N 71-RZ (as amended on April 30, June 14, September 12, 2002) // SPS “Garant”.

29. On the Environmental Fund of the Udmurt Republic: Law of the Urals of April 20, 2001 N 12-RZ // SPS “Garant”.

30. On the state strategy of the Russian Federation for environmental protection and sustainable development: Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of February 4, 1994 N 236 // SPS “Garant”.

31. On the animal world: Federal Law of April 24, 1995 N 52-FZ (as amended on November 11, 2003, November 2, December 29, 2004) // SPS “Garant”.

32. On the commission for the formation of a unified network of specially protected natural areas of the Udmurt Republic: Resolution of the Council of Ministers of the UR dated May 30, 1994 N 280 // ATP “Garant”.

33. On some urgent measures to improve the country’s environmental health: Resolution of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR dated November 27, 1989 // ATP “Garant”.

34. On the creation of the State Natural National Park “Losiny Ostrov”: Resolution of the Council of Ministers of the RSFSR dated August 24, 1983. No. 401 // ATP “Garant”.

35. On the creation of the State Natural National Park "Sochinsky": Resolution of the Council of Ministers of the RSFSR of May 5, 1983. No. 214//SPS “Garant”.

36. On the creation of NP “Nechkinsky”: Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 1323 of October 16, 1997 // SPS “Garant”.

37. On the creation of the natural park “Ust-Belsk”: Decree of the Government of the UR No. 828 dated 6.08.2001 // SPS “Garant”.

38. On the creation of the Sharkan natural park: Decree of the Government of the UR No. 1127 of November 5, 2001 // SPS “Garant”.

39. On the creation of the “Udmurt Botanical Garden”: Resolution of the Council of Ministers of the UR No. 364 dated December 29, 1990 // SPS “Garant”.

40. On the scheme of specially protected natural areas of the Udmurt Republic: Decree of the Government of the Ural Republic of December 18, 1995 N 377 // ATP “Garat”.

41. On the registration of public associations in the RSFSR and the registration fee: Resolution of the Supreme Council of the RSFSR dated December 18, 1991 No. 20571 // Gazette of the Congress of People's Deputies of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Council of the Russian Federation. -1992. No. 7.- Art. 299.

42. On the target budget environmental fund of the Udmurt Republic: Law of the SD of October 8, 2004. N39-P3 // ATP “Garant”.

43. List of state natural reserves and national natural parks recommended for organization on the territory of the Russian Federation in 1994-2005: Order of the Government of Russia of April 23, 1994, 572-r. // SPS "Garant".

44. List of state natural reserves and national parks that are planned to be organized on the territory of the Russian Federation in 2001-2010: Order of the Government of the Russian Federation of May 23, 2001 No. 725-r. // SPS "Garant".

45. Program of socio-economic development of the Udmurt Republic for 2005-2009. Izhevsk, 2004. 306 p.

46. ​​Forty-Second Congress. Session II Ch. 21-24. 1872. March 1, 1872. CHAP. XXIV.- An Act to set apart a certain Tract of Land lying near the Head-waters of the Yellowstone River as a public Park1. References

47. Alexandrova A.Yu. International tourism. M.: Aspect Press, 2001. -464 p.

48. Baikal region and Mongolia as components of the global ecotourism market: Sat. reports and recommendations of international. scientific conf. Part 1. -M., 2002. 108 p.

49. Baikal region and Mongolia as components of the global ecotourism market: Sat. reports and recommendations of international. scientific conf. Part 2. -M., 2002. 266 p.

50. Baranova O.G. Rare and endangered plants. Forests of Udmurtia / Ed. prof. V.V. Tuganaeva. Izhevsk: Udmurtia, 1997. pp. 142-161.

51. Bashkov M.P. Model of educational camp for high school students “Ecology in the profession” // Environmental education of the Urals: Abstracts. reports of the scientific-practical conference. Izhevsk, 1997 - pp. 18-19.

52. Bashkov M. Ecological Union “Veda”: together we are stronger! // Udm. Truth. 1998. - June 5 - P.5.

53. Bashkov M.P., Bashkova N.P., Levina V.N. Features of environmental education in camps for high school students // Ecology: law and environmental management: Scientific and practical. conf. Izhevsk: Detective-inform, 1998. P.166-168.

56. Yu. Birzhakov M.B. Introduction to tourism. SPb.: Publishing house. bargain. house "Gerda", 1999.320 p.

57. P. Bichon K., Green M., Phillins A. Models of national parks. M.: Publishing House TsODP, 2000. - 216 p.

58. Bondina N.V., Maksakovsky N.V., Rumyantseva T.A. The concept of forming a rational network of national parks // Rosgiproles 50 years: Sat. Art, dedicated 50th anniversary of the institute. - M., 1999. - P. 68-77.

59. Borodin I.P. Protection of natural monuments. M., 1914. - 31 p.

60. Brinchuk M.M. Environmental law (environmental law): Textbook for universities. - M.: Yurist, 1998. 400 p.

61. Bryzgalin G.A., Zakharov B.A. What are national parks and why are they established? Kharkov, 1919. - 95 p.

62. Weiner (Weiner) D.R. Ecology in Soviet Russia: Translated from English / Afterword. and ed. F.R. Shtilmarka.- M.: Progress, 1991. 400 p.

63. Vasiliev A. Environmentalists put a Cross on Udmurtia. Green // Izvestia UR 1999. - July 6. - P.2.

64. Vasilkovsky P.E. Nature conservation and local history. L.; M., 1927.-16 p.

65. Vedenin Yu. A. The concept of cultural landscape as the basis for the formation of a system of specially protected areas // Ekol. problem saving history and cult, heritage. - M., 1999. - P. 6-19.

66. Veselin B.V. National parks of Russia: yesterday, today, tomorrow // Reserved Islands. - 2001. - No. 1. - P. 2-3.

67. Goebel P. Natural heritage of humanity: Landscapes and treasures under UNESCO protection / Transl. with him. M. Zhdanova. M.: BMM AO, 1999. -256 p.

68. Geography of Udmurtia: Textbook. manual for secondary schools / Comp. N.T. Kozlova, V.M. Uspenskaya; Ed. N.T. Kozlova. Izhevsk: Udmurtia, 1999. - 239 p.

71. Hotel and tourism business / Ed. prof. HELL. Chudnovsky -M.: EKSMO, 1998. 352 p.

72. Gulyaev V.G. Organization of tourist activities: Proc. allowance / Moscow Academy of Economics and Law. M.: Knowledge, 1996. - 312 p.

74. Danilov-Danilyan V.I. Stop, look around. // Engineering ecology. 1997. No. 5. - pp. 12-17.

75. Dezhkin V.V., Puzachenko Yu.G. Concept of the system of specially protected natural territories of Russia (Author’s version). - M.: Publishing house Ros. Representative office of the World Wildlife Fund, 1999. - 67 p.

82. Denisova O. The school of guardians of protected areas in Ust-Belsk took place // Udm. Truth. 2005. - Oct 26 - N.W.

83. Deryabo S.D., Yasvin V.A. Ecological pedagogy and psychology. -Rostov/n Don: Phoenix, 1996 530 p.

84. Drozdov A.V. Ecological imperative and recreational geography // News of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ser. Geograph., 1998. No. 4. - P.91-97.

85. Dymova. M. G. The role and place of public organizations in environmental protection and rational use of natural resources // Ecology: law and environmental management: scientific and practical. conf. Izhevsk: Detective-inform, 1998. P.158-163.

87. Zabelina N.M., Isaeva-Petrova J1. S., Karaseva S. E. Nature reserve network of the country // Green Cross. - 1991. - No. 3-4. - pp. 17-18.

88. Zabelina N. M., Isaeva-Petrova JI. S., Karaseva S.E. State of the network of protected areas of the USSR // Organization of forms of protection of objects of natural reserve fund. - M., 1989. - P. 3-24.

89. Reserves and national parks of Russia: Photo album. - M.: Logata, 1998. - 160 p.

90. Reserves of the USSR. National parks and reserves. - M.: Mysl, 1991. - 356 p.

91. Information directory. To help tour and travel leaders, dedicated to the 90th anniversary of the birth of V.I. Lenin and the 40th anniversary of the Udm. ASSR. Izhevsk: Udmurtskaya Pravda, 1960. 27 p.

92. Irtegova O., Besogonov D. Environmental work needs coordination // Udm. truth 1998. - June 5. - SL.

93. Isakov Yu. A. Geoecological approach to constructing a system of territories and environmental objects // Geoecological. approaches to the design of natural-technical systems - M., 1985. - P. 115-144.

94. Isakov Yu. A Principles of planning a network of specially protected natural areas in the USSR // Landscape protection and design. - M., 1982. - P. 128-140.

95. Isakov Yu. A., Krinitsky V. V. System of protected natural territories of the Soviet Union and prospects for its development // Protected natural territories of the Soviet Union, their tasks and some research results. - M., 1983. - P. 12-30.

96. Kabushkin N.I. Tourism management: Textbook. allowance. Minsk: Publishing house BSEU, 1999.-644 p.

97. Kavaliauskas P. System design of a network of specially protected natural areas // Geoecol. approaches to the design of natural-technical systems. - M., 1985. - pp. 145-153.

98. How to create an NP / B.JI. Popov, Yu.V. Dobrushin, N.V. Maksakovsky. M.: Publishing house of the Center for Wildlife Conservation, 2001. - 23 p.

99. Karpova G.A., Kuznetsov D.G. Environmental aspects of tourism // Travel companies. Vol. 17. St. Petersburg: OLBIS, 1998. - pp. 67-76.

100. Quarterly V.A. Tourism: Textbook. M.: Finance and Statistics, 2000. -320 p.

101. Kvartalnov V.A. Theory and practice of tourism: Textbook. M.: Finance and Statistics, 2003. - 672 p.

103. Kobzev I.I. Izhevsk pictures: Photo album. Izhevsk: Publishing house. House "Udm. Univ., 2000. 208 p.

104. Kozhevnikov G.A. About protected areas. M., 1911. - 56 p.

105. Kozhevnikov G.A. On the need to establish protected areas for Russian nature. M., 1909. - 23 p.

106. Concept of tourism development in the Udmurt Republic (Project), Izhevsk, 1997.- 11 p.

107. Maksakovsky N.V. National parks in urbanized areas of Russia. - M.; Ryazan: Horizon, 1997. - 162 p.

108. Maksakovsky N.V., Popov V. JI. Principles of formation of the system of national parks of the Russian Federation // Forest protection and protection, mechanization, forest use: Review. inf. - M., 1995. - Issue. 6. - P. 1-40.

109. Maltseva E.A., Kostina N.M. Pedagogy of children's movement. Izhevsk: Publishing house. house "Udm. University", 2000. - 516 p.

110. Materials of the VII scientific and practical conference (dedicated to the 245th anniversary of Izhevsk). Izhevsk, 2005. 319 p.

111. Tourism management: Tourism and industry systems: Textbook. M.: Finance and Statistics, 2001. - 272 p.

112. Merzlyakova G.V., Batalova J1.B. History of tourism and excursion business in Russia (using the example of the Udmurt Republic). Izhevsk: Publishing House “Udm. University", 2005. - 125 p.

114. Mokrushin B. P., Tukhvatullin Z.A. On the problem of constructing a facility for recycling solid fuel strategic missiles in the Botkinsky district of the Udmurt Republic. Izhevsk, 1999. 30 p.

115. Nechkinsky Reserve // ​​Our World. 2001. - No. 11-12. - P.6.

116. Nikolaev S. V., Maksakovsky N. V. Particularly valuable objects of natural and natural-historical-cultural heritage of the peoples of the Russian Federation.

117. M.: Publishing House of Moek Independent Ecological and Political Science. University, 1997. - 120 p.

118. Nikolaevsky A. G. National parks. - M.: Agropromizdat, 1985. - 189 p.

119. Pakin D.V. , Pakina A.A. Russian Internet market of ecological tours: state and prospects // Tourism, ecology and sustainable development of regions: Materials of the international. scientific-practical conf. Tver: Tver State University Publishing House, 2003. - pp. 272-275.

120. Panov I.N. Ecological tourism // Geography. 1997. No. 45. - P. 11.

121. Panfilov A. The first in Udmurtia and the thirty-first in Russia // Izvestia UR. - 1997. - June 26. - SL.

122. Pakhomov V.V. From the experience of the public environmental community “Oikumena” // Ecological Bulletin. 2000. - No. 1. -P.117-118.

123. Perevoshchikov A.P. Izhevsk: Economic-geographical and social essay. Izhevsk Udmurtia, 1995. 380 p.

124. Platunova T.M. Program for organizing and conducting an eco-tourist camp for teenagers. Izhevsk, 1999. - 14 p.

125. Volga region: Directory-guide to the Volga, Kama, Oka and their navigable tributaries for 1930 / Comp. Yu.M. Bocharov and others; Ed. S.T. Kovylkin 2nd ed., Spanish. and additional Ex. Volzh. state river fleet. - M., 1930.-296 p.

126. In the native land: Historical and cultural attractions of Udmurtia. Ustinov: Udmurtia, 1987. - 200 p.

127. Natural attractions of Udmurtia: Catalog / Comp. A.G. Illarionov, G.N. Morozova Izhevsk, 1990. - 64 p.

128. Guide to the Urals. 1st ed. - Ekaterinburg: Type. weekly newspaper "Ural", 1899. - 323 p.

129. Development of the NP network in Russia / N.V. Maksakovsky. M.: Publishing house of the Center for Wildlife Conservation, 2002. - 40 p.

130. Regulated tourism and recreation in national parks / M. Yu. Travkina. - M.: Publishing house of the Center for Wildlife Conservation, 2002. - 80 p. - Additional materials to the Management Strategy for National Parks of Russia. Vol. 10.

131. Reimers N. F., Shtilmark F. R. Specially protected natural areas. - M.: Mysl, 1978. - 295 p.

132. Recreational systems / Ed. N.S. Mironenko M.: Moscow State University Publishing House, 1986. - 136 p.

133. Collection of guidance documents on conservation matters / Comp. V. B. Stepanitsky. - 3rd ID, extra. and processed - M: Publishing House of the Center for Wildlife Conservation, 2000. - 703 p.

134. Senin B.S. Organization of international tourism. M.: Finance and Statistics, 1999. - 400 p.

135. Sergeeva T.K. Ecological tourism: Textbook. M.: Finance and Statistics, 2004. - 360 p.

138. Modern socio-political technologies in the sphere of formation of tolerant social consciousness: Materials of VII scientific-practical. Conf. - Izhevsk: Publishing House “Udm. University", 2002. 152 p.

139. Solovyov D.K. Types of organizations promoting nature conservation. Petrograd, 1918. 45 p.

140. Stepanitsky V. B. Commentary on the Federal Law of the Russian Federation “On Specially Protected Natural Areas.” - M.: Publishing house. Center for Wildlife Conservation, 1997. - 232 p.

141. Stepanitsky V.B. Russian system of protected areas: national parks as part of this system // Materials of the seminar “National. parks as an example of multifunctional protected areas in Russia.” February 14-15, 2001 Sebezh - St. Petersburg, 2001. -S. 12-14.

142. Management strategy for Russian national parks. - M.: Publishing House of the Center for Wildlife Conservation, 2002. - 46 p.

144. Taliev V.I. Protect nature. Kharkov, 1913. - 68 p.

145. Tishkov A.A. OPT of Russia and the world//Geography. 1993.-No. 13-14. - P.2-3.

146. Tishkov A. A. The protected nature of Russia - today and tomorrow // Energy: economics, technology, ecology. - 1994. - No. 2. - pp. 45-49.

147. Tishkov A. A. Protected natural areas and the formation of a sustainability framework // Assessing the quality of the environment and ecology. mapping. - M., 1995. - P. 94-107.

150. Tranin A. A. National parks in the USSR: problems and prospects. - M.: Nauka, 1991. -293 p.

151. Tourism and the environment. Development of environmentally responsible tourism in Russia // Materials of the 1st Russian-German. Conf., October 13-15, 1992 Berlin. M, 1993.

152. Tourism, ecology and sustainable development of regions // Materials of the international. scientific-practical conf. Tver: TvGU Publishing House, 2003. - 442 p.

153. Tourism, ecology and sustainable development of regions // Materials of the 2nd All-Russian. scientific-practical conf. Tver: TvGU Publishing House, 2005. - 252 p.

154. Tourist terminological dictionary: Reference method. allowance / Author. comp. I.V. Zorin, V.A. Quarterly. - M.: Sov. sport, 1999. - P.637.

155. Management of natural resources in national parks / B.V. Veseli. - M.: Publishing House of the Center for Wildlife Conservation, 2001. - 78 p. Additional materials to the Management Strategy for National Parks of Russia. Vol. 2.

156. Usyskin G.S. Essays on the history of Russian tourism St. Petersburg: Publishing house. bargain. house “Gerda”, 2000.-216 p.

157. Khrabovchenko V.V. Ecological tourism: Educational method. allowance. M.: Finance and Statistics, 2003. - 208 p.

158. Khrabovchenko V.V. Definition and species composition of ecotourism: world experience and Russian specifics // Tourism, ecology and sustainable development of regions: Proceedings of the international scientific and practical conference. - Tver: Tver State University Publishing House, 2003. pp. 343-345.

159. Tsvetukhina M., Perevozchikov G. An ecological trail leads to Tol Babai, or the first step on the path to exoticism // Izvestia UR-2003. Oct 23 - P. 12.

160. Chizhova V.P. Issues of forecasting the creation of national parks in the USSR // Methodology and methods of geogr. forecasting. - M., 1983. - P. 135-144.

161. Chizhova V.P. National parks of the USSR and ways of their development // Environmental education in high boots. - M., 1985. - P. 112-128.

162. Chizhova V.P., Petrov A.V., Rybakov A.V. System of specially protected natural territories in the USSR // Economic-geographical problems of ecology. - M.„ 1984. - P. 122-141.

164. Shapoval G.F. History of tourism. Minsk: Ecoperspective, 1999. - 176 p.

165. Shirobokov S.I. Udm. ASSR: Economic and geographical essay. Izhevsk: Udmurtia, 1969.- 327 p.

167. Shtilmark F. R. “But hope still sings in the distance.” // Wildlife Conservation. - 2000. - No. 12. - P. 73-76.

168. Shtilmark F.R. Natural reserves as a social and public phenomenon // Sovrem. problems of geography and environmental management. - Barnaul, 2001. - No. 5-6. - pp. 202-207.

169. Shtyumer Yu.A. Nature conservation and tourism. M.: Physical culture and sport, 1974.- 104 p.

170. Shumilov E.F. Architecture of Izhevsk. History of development and prospects of architecture, urban planning and monumental art. Izhevsk, Udmurtia, 1978. 116 p.

171. Eitingon A.I. Ecological tourism. M.: RIB "Tourist", 2001. - 40 p.

172. Ecotourism on the way to Russia. Principles, recommendations, Russian and foreign experience / Comp. E.Yu. Ledovskikh, N.V. Moraleva, A.V. Drozdov. -Tula: Grif and K, 2002. 284 p.

173. Yampolsky L A. Public protection of environmental rights of citizens. // Environmental Bulletin. 2000. - No. 1- P. 163-165.

174. Banff National Park Management Plan. - Calgary (Canada): Ed. Environment Canada: Ed. Can. Parks Service, 1988. - 239 p.

175. Boo E. Ecotounsm: The Potentials and Pitfalls. Vol. 1- 2. World Wide Fund for Nature, Washington DC, 1990.

176. Cater E., Lowman G. (eds.) Ecotounsm. A sustainable option? John Wiley and Sons Ltd. Chichester, 1994. -P.39-40.

177. Conserving Europe's Natural Heritage: Towards a European Ecological Network - Proc of an Internat. Conf, Maastricht, 9-12 Nov., 1993 / Ed. G. Bennett. - L., 1994. - 334 p.

178. Conserving Russia's Biological Diversity: An Analytical Framework and Initial Investment Portfolio / Ed. V. Krever, E. Dinerstein, D. Olson, L. Williams. - Washington (DC., USA): WWF, 1994. - 125 p.

179. Heath E., Wall G. Marketing Tourism Destinations. A strategic planning approach. Printed by John Willey and Sons, Inc., 1992, 225 p.

180. Gatineau Park Master Plan. - Ottawa (Canada): Nat. Capital Com., 1990. - 137 p.; Guidelines for Protected Area Management Categories. - Gland

181. Switzerland): IUCN Com. on Nat. Parks and Protected Areas; Cambridge (UK): World Conservation Monitoring Centre, 1994. - 117 p.

182. Glen T. Hvenegaard. Ecotourism. A status report and conceptual framework // The Journal of Tourism Studies. 1994.Vol. 5, No. 2. P. 24-32.

184. Management Policies. - Washington (DC., USA): US. Dept. of the Int., Nat. Park Service, 1988. - 160 p.

185. Parks and Protected Areas in Canada. Planning and Management. - Toronto (Canada): Oxford Univ. Press, 1993. - 336 p.

186. Parks Canada Guide to Management Planning. - Ottawa (Canada): Can. Heritage, Parks Canada, 1994. - 24 p.

187. Parks Canada Guiding Principles and Operational Policies. - Ottawa (Canada): Can. Heritage, Parks Canada, 1994. - 125 p.

188. Protected Landscapes: A Comparative European Perspective. - Halield (UK): Univ. of Herefordshire, 1992. - 266 p.

189. Protected landscapes in the United Kingdom. - Manchester (UK): Counryside Comis., 1992. -54 p.

190. Ross S. Wall G. Evaluating Ecotourism: the Case of North Sulawesi, Indonesia // Tourism Management. 1999. Vol.20, No. 6. P.673-682.

191. Udvardi M. D. F. A classification of the biogeographical provinces of the world HIUCN Occas Pap. - 1975. - No. 18. - P. 1-45.

192. Valentine P. Ecotourism and Nature Conservation: A definition with some recent developments in Micronesia // Tourism Management. 1993 Vol.14, No.2. P.107-115.1. Dissertations

193. Batalova JI.B. The emergence and development of tourism and excursion business in Russia 1917-1969. (using the example of the Udmurt Republic): Dis. Ph.D. history Sciences: 07.00.02/ Udmurt State University - Izhevsk, 2001. - 175 p.

194. Moroz I.M. Excursion and tourism activities in protected areas: Dis. Ph.D. economics, sciences: 08.00.05/ Sochi State University of Tourism and Resort Business. Sochi, 2004. - 167 p.

195. Tikhonova I.V. Economics of ecological tourism on Lake Baikal: problems and development paths: Dis. Ph.D. economic sciences: 08.00.05/ Irkutsk State Economic Academy. Irkutsk, 1999. - 157 p.

196. National report on the state of the natural environment of the Udmurt Republic in 1996. Izhevsk: IzhSTU Publishing House, 1997 -171 p.

197. State report “On the state of the natural environment of the Udmurt Republic in 1998”: Inf. ed. Izhevsk: IzhSTU Publishing House, 1999. - 242 p.

198. State report “On the state of the natural environment of the Udmurt Republic in 1999”: Inf. ed. Izhevsk: Izhevsk State Technical University Publishing House, 2000. - 243 p.

199. State report “On the state of the natural environment of the Udmurt Republic in 2000”: Inf. ed. Izhevsk: IzhSTU Publishing House, 2001.-238 p.

200. State report “On the state of the natural environment of the Udmurt Republic in 2001”: Inf. ed. Izhevsk: IzhSTU Publishing House, 2002. 240 pp.

201. State report “On the state of the natural environment of the Udmurt Republic in 2002”: Inf. ed. Izhevsk: IzhSTU Publishing House, 2003. 236 pp.

202. State report “On the state of the natural environment of the Udmurt Republic in 2004”: Inf. ed. Izhevsk: IzhSTU Publishing House, 2005. - 198 p.

203. Udmurt Republic: Encyclopedia / Government of the Udmurt Republic; Ch. edited by V.V. Tuganaev. Izhevsk: Udmurtia, 2000. 800 p.

204. Encyclopedia of the world around us “Around the World”. Singapore: White City, 1998.-288 p.1. Global Internet

205. Bochkareva T.V. Ecotourism: analysis of existing international experience Access mode: http://www.rustowns.com/

206. Press release from the UN Information Center in Moscow dated February 13, 2002. Access mode: http://www.mountain.ru/ecology/

207. Official website of the UN. Access mode: http7/www.un.org.

208. Official website of UNESCO. Access mode: http://portal.unesco.org

209. Official website of UNEP. Access mode: http://www.unep.org/

210. IUCN official website. Access mode: http://www.iucn.org/

211. USAID official website. Access mode: http://www.usaid.gov/

212. WWF official website. Access mode: http://wwf.org/

213. Official website of the World Wildlife Fund (Russian branch). Access mode: http://www.wwf.ru/

214. Yu. Official website of the Global Environment Facility. Access mode: http://www.ifc.org/

215. TIES official website. Access mode: http://www.ecotourism.org12.0 official WTO website. Access mode: http://www.world-tourism.org

216. Official website of the 2002 Ecotourism Summit. Access mode: http://www.ecotourism2002.org

217. Official website of RAET. Access mode: http://www.ecotourismrussia.ru/

218. Official website of the Dersu Uzala Ecotourism Development Fund. Access mode: http://ecotours.ru/16.0 official website of the CDOP. Access mode: http://www.biodiversity.ru/

219. Petrasov I. The concept of sustainable development in relation to world tourism. Access mode: http://www.publication.narod.ru /author/petrasov/

220. Official website of National Parks of Canada. Access mode: http://www.pc.gc.ca

221. Banff National Park website. Access mode: http://www.pc.gc.ca/pn-np/ab/banff/

222. Jasper National Park website. Access mode: http://www.pc.gc.ca/pn-np/ab/jasper/180tr35.0official page of the Sarek National Park. Access mode: http://www.mternat.environ.se/docuinents/nature/engparkdoc/esarek.hnn

223. 3b. Page of the Stora-Sjöfallet National Park. Access mode: http://www.internat.environ.se/documents/nature/engparkdoc/estoras.htm.

224. Official website of Swedish national parks. Access mode: http://www.internat.environ.se/

225. Official website of UK National Parks. Access mode: http://www.countrygoer.org/natpk.htm

226. Official website of German national parks. Access mode: http://www.naturp ark.de/

227. Official website of Italian national parks. Access mode: http://www.parks.it/

228. Website of national parks of Ecuador. Access mode: http://www.ecuadorexplorer.com/htmI/nationalparks.html

229. Website of African national parks. Access mode: http://www.sanparks.org/; http://www.wildlifeafrica.co.za/etosha.html

230. Website of Asian national parks. Access mode: http://www.world-national-parks.net/as/

231. Australian National Parks website. Access mode: http://www.atn com au/parks/

232. Children's environmental camps. Access mode: http://www.ecotoursru/russian/ecocamp/index.htm

233. Moraleva N.V., Gubareva E.V. Ecological tourism and children's environmental movement. Access mode: http://ecotours ru/russian/publications/ecotours.htm

234. Website “Izhevsk cultural capital”. Access mode: http://www.izhcult.ru

Please note that the scientific texts presented above are posted for informational purposes only and were obtained through original dissertation text recognition (OCR). In this connection, they may contain errors associated with imperfect recognition algorithms. There are no such errors in the PDF files of dissertations and abstracts that we deliver.

The first definition of ecotourism was proposed by the Mexican environmental economist Hector Ceballos-Lascurain in 1980. Ecotourism, as defined by the author, is a combination of travel with an environmentally sensitive attitude towards nature, allowing to combine the joy of meeting and studying specimens of flora and fauna with the opportunity to contribute to their protection.

Since the first definition of ecotourism appeared, many new options have been proposed by various authors and organizations interested in developing this type of activity.

The WTO definition states: “Ecotourism includes all forms of nature-based tourism in which the primary motivation of tourists is to observe and experience nature.”

The International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) defines ecotourism as “environmentally responsible travel through relatively undisturbed natural areas to explore natural and cultural attractions, which promotes nature conservation, has a “soft” impact on the environment, and provides active social -economic participation of local residents and their benefits from these activities.”

The World Wildlife Fund offers its own definition: “Ecotourism is nature-based tourism that promotes conservation.”

The ecotourism society views ecotourism as “purposeful travel to natural areas with the aim of gaining a deeper understanding of local culture and the natural environment, which does not violate the integrity of ecosystems, making the protection of natural resources beneficial for local residents.”

The emergence and development of ecological tourism is closely connected with the history of identifying natural areas that are especially attractive from aesthetic and recreational points of view, with the development of standards for their use and protection. The first national park was established in North America in 1872 in the Yellowstone area. By the end of the 19th century. In the unique corners of nature of the “Wild West”, a whole series of national parks were created: in 1885 - Banff and Glacier, in 1886 - Yoho, in 1890 - Yosemite, in 1895 - Waterton Lake. The process of creating national parks in the world intensified sharply after the Second World War. Thus, if in 1950 there were about 200 parks in 39 countries, then in 1982 their number exceeded 1 thousand. Developing countries were distinguished by their high rates of organization of national parks. Thus, in Indonesia, in two years (1980-1982), the creation of 16 national parks with a total area of ​​49.3 thousand km was announced.

In 1990, ecotourism was given official status, with which it acquired the right to convene its own annual international symposium “Annual World Congress on Adventure Travel & Ecotourism” and create its own non-profit organizations.

Assessments of the current state and level of development of ecotourism in various publications vary significantly. Most of the differences relate to the definition of ecotourism. Thus, if we take as a basis the idea that ecological tourism unites all forms of recreation based on the use of natural resources, then the estimate of volumes will be much higher than in the case when ecological tourism includes recreational and educational activities in nature, accompanied by technology environmental management.

In countries with particularly outstanding natural beauty, tourism is often the main reason for the creation of national parks. Costa Rica, for example, has declared 30% of its territory a conservation area. Tourism in this country is the leading source of income and reaches $650 million per year. In South Africa, ecotourism ranks second in terms of profitability after diamond mining, and in Alaska it ranks second after oil mining. Kenya's annual income from the use of national parks reaches $450 million; Ecuador, accordingly, receives more than $180 million from ecotourism in the Galapagos Islands. In Rwanda's Volcanoes National Park, tourists who come to see mountain gorillas spend about $1 million in entrance fees and $2 to $3 million in other expenses. According to the Italian State Institute of Statistics (ISTAT), by the end of 1998 there were 9,718 rural holiday establishments registered in Italy, an increase of 14.7% compared to 1997. 45% of these farms are located in northeastern Italy, mainly in the province of Bolzano (27.6%). 24% of village tourism facilities are concentrated in the central regions of Italy, most of which are concentrated in Tuscany (15%). Village tourism is least common in the south of Italy and on the islands.

The history of mass nature-oriented tourism in Russia has its own specifics associated with the historical development of the country, the peculiarities of its natural conditions and the historically established relationship between man and nature.

Recreation, until the end of the 19th century, was the lot of the Russian nobility, who vacationed mainly in Europe. The Russian tourist market until the First World War and the February Revolution of 1917. had two main segments - elite tourism of the wealthy and excursion and recreational tourism of the intelligentsia.

Organized tourism, which has a natural and educational orientation, began to take shape in the country by the end of the 19th century. It is surprising that even then environmental principles were laid into the basis of tourism activities. The charter of the Crimean Mountain Club, created in 1890 in Odessa, contained almost the same provisions that are recognized as the most important in modern ecotourism. The goals of the club were:

  • 1) Scientific research of the Tauride (Crimean) mountains and dissemination of information collected about them.
  • 2) Encouragement to visit and explore these mountains and make it easier for naturalists and artists going to the mountains for scientific or artistic purposes.
  • 3) Support for local agriculture, horticulture and small-scale mining.
  • 4) Protection of rare mountain species of plants and animals.

The Yalta branch of the club was the first in Russia to create trails to facilitate walking excursions into the mountains. The first, in 1899, was the Shtangeevskaya trail, which led from the Uchan-Su waterfall to the Yayly ridge through the most picturesque sections of its eastern slope. Following Shtangeevskaya, the Botkinskaya trail was developed and began to be used for tourist purposes, which led through picturesque pine forests to the Yauzlar waterfall. A little later, the Krestovaya and Dmitrievskaya trails appeared. Following the trails, the first shelter in Russia was created on Chatyrdag, where tourists visiting the Bin-Bashkhoba and Suuk-Khoba caves could stay. The number of excursionists who used the services of the Yalta branch of the club in 1896 was 1,491 people, in 1912 - 15,229 people.

In 1895, a society of cyclist tourists was created, and in 1902, the Caucasian Mountain Society was created to provide excursion services for vacationers in the cities of the Caucasian Mineral Waters. Children's natural history excursions became widespread in Russia at the beginning of the 20th century. A wonderful example of an ecological tour is an excursion conducted by 1st grade schoolchildren in Finland.

March 20, 1919 V.I. Lenin signed the Decree “On Medical Areas of National Importance.” In 1920, under the People's Commissariat of Education, the “United Lecture and Excursion Bureau” was created - the prototype of modern tourist and excursion institutions. Russian tourism in the post-revolutionary years continued the traditions of a natural history and natural history orientation: all excursion stations organized in 1919 worked according to a natural history program. During this period, one-day and multi-day excursions were conducted in geology, soil science, botany and zoology. Much attention was paid to attracting young people to local history and tourist excursion work. The organization of children's tourism was entrusted to the extracurricular department of the People's Commissariat of Education, which was headed by N.K. Krupskaya. The organization of tourism for adults was carried out by special units created at many institutions. Nature excursions were developed and offered by young naturalist stations.

By the end of the 30s. amateur tourism has gained popularity and wide scope. Most of the tourist activities of that time contained elements of ecological tours. These include short-term, weekend-long trips of relatively small groups of vacationers to areas located in close proximity to large cities, and multi-day trips across the country. Citizens who took part in long hikes not only got acquainted with the nature of the country, but also carried out educational work among the population of regions remote from industrial centers, helped in harvesting, etc.

To facilitate communication with the local population of remote territories, the Society of Proletarian Tourism and Excursions published a series of pocket speech guides in more than 20 languages ​​of the peoples of the USSR (Abkhaz, Svan, Uzbek, Tajik, etc.). Amateur tourist groups developed new routes, actively participated in research activities to search for mineral deposits and useful plants, studied the distribution and behavior of wild animals, and collected entomological and botanical collections.

Mass tourism was ensured by initiatives in the regions, so almost the entire country was involved in tourism activities. There was a huge growth in tourism at the end of the 50s. According to official statistics, the number of participants in tourist trips was: in 1958. -1,512,860 people, in 1959 - 3,382,868 people, in 1960 - 5,892,853 people. From 1947 to 1962, the number of tourist bases in the country increased from 96 to 297, over 200 tourist and health camps, 600 fisherman’s and hunter’s houses, and more than 800 tourist equipment rental points were created. All this made it possible to cover more than 10 million people with tourist trips and excursions.

Amateur tourism in the post-war years followed the same directions as before the war, namely: local history orientation, nature conservation raids, and performing socially useful work in forestries, public and scientific organizations were welcomed. In 1965, 40 million people took part in tourist trips and excursions, there were 450 bases with 95,200 places in the country, and 5 thousand tourist and health camps were at the disposal of vacationers.

In the late 60s - mid 70s. Such difficult hikes were prepared and carried out as a 13-day hike through the unexplored, deep regions of Spitsbergen, polar hikes to Taimyr, Severnaya Zemlya, Franz Josef Land, Chukotka. During the same period, active work was carried out to find new routes for amateur tourist travel. So in 1969, search expeditions worked in the Sayan Mountains, the Baikal region, the Eastern Caucasus, and the Pamirs. As a result of the work of these expeditions, more than 60 hiking, mountain, water and combined routes were explored and developed.

Particular attention was paid to the development of tourism in the regions. So in the late 70s. the number of walking routes alone in Yakutia reached almost 500, more than 15 thousand weekend hikes took place in the Khabarovsk Territory, the number of participants in Sunday “forays” in the Irkutsk region exceeded 200 thousand. On January 1, 1977, in the USSR there were 9058 planned routes that ran along many regions of the country. They were provided by 996 special tourist hotels, bases and campsites, which annually hosted 26 million people. Every year in the second half of the 70s. The country served over 140 million tourists. Thus, mass nature-oriented tourism, which became widespread, was not localized in individual regions, but covered almost the entire territory of the country.

In 1970-1985 The number of people involved in active forms of tourism, and, above all, in amateur tourism, has increased significantly: annually over 30 million people took part in hikes around their native land on weekend routes and other excursions. During this period, new forms of service and types of services were introduced: routes for parents with children, autotourists, horseback, boat, combined trips, etc. The volume of services provided to Soviet workers and youth of the country in 1985 exceeded 2 billion rubles. (4 times more than in 1970). By 1985, the system of the Central Council for Tourism and Excursions operated over 960 tourist hotels, campsites and bases with a total capacity of about 400 thousand beds. There were 925 travel and excursion agencies operating in the country, which implemented 20 thousand topics in excursion work.

Development of tourism in Russia in the 90s. V.A. Kvartalnov called it a “transitional” period, in which the sprouts of something new were visible, but the general situation can be defined as a “sharp, almost catastrophic decline.” At this stage of the development of Russian tourism, three main trends dominated.

The first trend is changes in the structure of demand and segmentation of the tourism market. A decrease in the demand for long-term vacations and a noticeable increase in the need for short-term vacations. Rising prices for transport and reducing travel distances. Increasing requirements for the quality of services in the household sector (food, housing); differentiation of demand in accordance with the social status of various population groups. A sharp drop in demand for group travel, an increase in demand for family vacations and foreign trips.

The second trend is associated with the transition from monopoly to a multi-structured tourism economy, to the development of private, medium and small enterprises. A sharp decrease in subsidies from the state, trade unions, large enterprises for social tourism, a general drop in income of the population led to a noticeable reduction in the number of large recreational institutions, especially in 1992. At the same time, small tourist enterprises began to appear, providing services to small campsites, overnight rooms, beaches, cafes , parking lots, souvenir shops, etc. .

The third trend is the transition to the use of tourism resources on the basis of new economic relations. This tendency, according to the author, is still hidden and is going through a latent phase. It is based on relations of ownership of resources - the redistribution of rights to their use between the federal, republican and municipal levels of government, as well as the emergence of private property rights, primarily to land. Obviously, in this situation, an opportunity arises for the formation of a new economic mechanism based on the introduction of differential rent on the resources used in tourism. Currently, this rent, determined by the advantage of location, only serves to enrich the owner of the resources. But it should be directed to maintaining the quality of resources, developing tourism infrastructure, etc.

The development of ecological tourism by domestic SPNAs (Specially Protected Natural Areas) is an extremely important process that can have a significant impact both on the economy of the Russian hinterland and on the intensification of activities to protect the country’s unique natural areas. It is the protected areas that can intensify the development of nature-oriented tourism in the country, stimulate the inbound flow, and organize it in the form of eco-tourism. For these purposes, protected areas have a unique, organized territory, competent scientific and administrative personnel, experience in nature conservation and restoration, close contacts with domestic (fundamental and applied) science, foreign connections and contacts, and security structures.

The current state of eco-tourism activities in the country's protected areas. Specific information about the size of the tourist flow on the territory of Russian nature reserves was published by V.P. Kekushev, V.P. Sergeev, V.B. Stepanitsky. According to the authors, by the end of 1999, 76 nature reserves in the country (79%) had identified ecological trails and routes on their territory (in the protected zone, in the territory of controlled reserves and natural monuments, or in the marginal territory). The average length of these trails and routes per reserve was 57 km; 22 reserves (24%) already have ecological trails and routes on their territory or are in the process of being developed. In 1999, tourist groups visited 64 reserves (67%), including foreign tourist groups - 47 reserves (49%). The total number of visitors to the reserves was over 140 thousand people, including foreigners - over 5 thousand people. Over 300 thousand people visited the recreational area of ​​the famous Stolby Nature Reserve in the Krasnoyarsk Territory. Work in the field of museum affairs, focused exclusively on visitors to nature reserves, is inextricably linked with environmental tourism activities. 37 reserves (39%) have their own nature museums.

The data presented show that recreation in the territories of domestic protected areas is in the first stages of development, when the number of visitors is relatively small: for comparison, large national parks in the West receive up to several million visitors a year.

Despite the difficulties of the first stages of development of tourism activities, a number of national parks in the country demonstrate obvious success in the development of eco-tourism. These include national parks: Vodlozersky, Yugyd-Va, Kenozersky, Losiny Ostrov and some others. The team of the Ugra National Park, with the support of the Wildlife Conservation Center charity foundation, is successfully developing rural tourism, the Eco-Village program is being developed in the Tunkinsky NP, etc.

State nature reserves, following the changing realities of world development, realizing that conservation can actively contribute to development, and vice versa, demonstrate examples of the transition from reserve functions to the functions of a biosphere territory.

The conditions for the development of the eco-tourism industry and increasing competitiveness in the world market are currently:

  • 1. Creating a favorable image of the region in the Russian and international tourism markets. Good marketing of the city is necessary. Today, any large Western city cannot do without a special department - a marketing service that studies the city's market, calculates trends and develops development prospects.
  • 2. Information support for regional tourism business
  • 3. Real assistance from authorities to tourism enterprises developing inbound and domestic tourism.
  • 4. Improving the quality of tourist services.
  • 5. Promoting the training of qualified personnel in the production of tourism products.

Despite objective and subjective difficulties, ecotourism in the country is developing and taking on more and more distinct forms. Training specialists for the field of ecotourism is one of the most important conditions for the successful development of the industry.


Eurasian National University named after L.N. Gumilyov
Faculty __________________
Department ___________________

Abstract
On the topic: “History of the development of ecological tourism”

Completed_________________
Checked(s)________________

Astana 2011
Plan:

    Introduction
    1. Definition of “ecotourism”
    2. The essence of ecotourism
    3. Types of ecotourism
    History of the emergence and development of ecotourism
    Development of ecotourism in Kazakhstan
    Growth dynamics of the ecotourism market
    Factors and forecasts for the development of ecotourism
    Conclusion
    List of used literature
    9. Application
Introduction
The most promising research of an international nature includes the study of tourism as a sociocultural phenomenon. Since tourism has become an integral factor in social development, it can be considered as an object of historical research. Tourism has long been considered one of the most profitable and rapidly developing sectors of the world economy. But every year the negative aspects of mass tourism become more and more obvious.
Negative aspects of the impact of mass tourism on the environment and tourism resources were noted back in the 70s in foreign and domestic studies. Today, anthropogenic pressure and its inhibitory influence on development are observed in almost all sectors of the tourism industry and types of tourism, in the vast majority of tourist areas. For example, already in 1973-1983. In Poland, for this reason, the length of tourist water routes along rivers and lakes has decreased by 40%, and sea routes by 70%. The area of ​​damaged forests increased by 60%. Since 1976, in the USA, in the Balinger Canyon, as a result of the movement of vehicles serving tourists, the average rate of soil and soil loss was 86 times higher than the maximum permissible.
In the 80s XX century A new form of tourism began to take shape - ecological tourism, ecotourism, the purpose of which is environmental education and promoting the conservation of nature and local culture. The development of ecotourism in the world is closely connected with the formation of a system of specially protected natural areas (SPNA) - natural reserves, national parks, and natural monuments. Today, ecotourism plays a significant role in the global tourism industry. According to experts from the World Tourism Organization (WTO), in the 21st century. The growth rate of ecotourism will continue to be high, and the income generated will make a significant contribution to the development of the economies of many countries around the world, especially developing ones.

Definition of ecotourism

According to P. Shackleford, WTO representative for Europe, the term "ecotourism" has been used in the tourism industry for more than 10 years. There are also claims that the term was first used by Miller in 1978 as a designation for one of the options for sustainable tourism development.

However, in some cases, we mean travel undertaken to areas of nature untouched by civilization: ecotourism - “travel to relatively undistorted or unpolluted areas with unique natural objects for the admiration and enjoyment of the landscape, wild plants and wild animals, as well as any cultural manifestations in these areas ". In other cases, it is an effort to maintain ecological balance in nature: ecotourism is “nature tourism that involves the study of the natural and cultural environment and serves to improve the conditions in this environment.”

This definition has much in common with the definition of the International Ecotourism Organization (TIES): ecotourism is “responsible travel to natural areas, areas that preserve the environment and support the well-being of local residents.”

For a deeper understanding of this type of travel, here is
10 commandments of ecotourism, formulated by TIES:
1) remember the vulnerability of the Earth;
2) leave only traces, take away only photographs;
3) explore the world into which you find yourself: the culture of peoples, geography;
4) respect local residents;
5) do not buy products from manufacturers that endanger the environment;
6) always follow only well-trodden paths;
7) support environmental protection programs;
8) where possible, use environmental conservation methods;
9) support organizations that promote nature protection;
10) travel with companies that support the principles of ecotourism.

There is a whole range of ecotourism features:
- any journey during which the traveler explores the environment;
- a journey in which nature is the main value;
- income from ecotourism is used to financially support environmental protection;
- ecotourists personally participate in activities that conserve or restore wildlife resources;
- an ecotour is a journey in which all activities are “ecologically friendly”.

Summarizing all the options considered, we can distinguish three main components of ecotourism:

1) “knowledge of nature”, i.e. travel presupposes the presence of elements of studying nature, obtaining new knowledge and skills by tourists;
2) “preservation of ecosystems” implies not only the appropriate behavior of the group on the route, but also the participation of tourists and tour operators in programs and activities to protect the environment;
3) “respect for the interests of local residents” - not only compliance with local laws and customs, but also the contribution of tourism to the socio-economic development of tourist destinations. As they say, the art of being a traveler is the art of being a good guest. The logo of one of the English youth tourism conferences reminds us of this (Fig. 1.1).

Types of ecotourism

Currently, there are four types of ecotourism and eco-tours.

1. Scientific tourism. During scientific ecotours, tourists participate in various types of nature research and conduct field observations. For example, ecotours related to observing the behavior of birds in Latin America and counting the number of whale populations in the Pacific Ocean are widely known. As a rule, tourist destinations in such tours are specially protected natural areas (SPNA): nature reserves, sanctuaries, national parks, natural monuments. Scientific tourism also includes foreign research expeditions, as well as field practices of students studying at natural science faculties of universities and institutes.

2. Nature history tours. These are trips related to knowledge of the surrounding nature and local culture. As a rule, such tours are a combination of educational, popular science and thematic excursions that run along specially equipped environmental trails. Most often, they are also organized in the territories of nature reserves and national parks. This also includes trips for schoolchildren, during which the teacher and guide conduct excursions and conversations about nature. This type of ecotourism is especially popular in Germany, which is why it is also called the “German model of ecotourism development.”

3. Adventure tourism. This type combines all travel associated with active methods of movement and outdoor recreation, with the goal of obtaining new sensations, impressions, improving the tourist’s physical fitness and achieving sports results. This includes such types of tourism as mountaineering, rock climbing, ice climbing, caving tourism, mountain and hiking tourism, water, ski and
ski tourism, canyoning, horseback riding, mountain biking, diving, paragliding, etc. Many of these types of tourism are recent and are considered extreme because they involve great risk. At the same time, this is the fastest growing, profitable, although expensive, type of ecotourism. Adventure tourism is often called "hard ecotourism" due to the fact that tourists' thirst for adventure here prevails over conservation motives.

4. Traveling to natural reserves, protected areas. The high attractiveness of unique and exotic natural objects and phenomena located in protected areas attract many tourists. For example, 48% of tourists arriving in Latin America intend to travel to natural reserves. The management of many national parks and reserves turn ecological excursions into a real show. An example is Yellowstone National Park in the USA, where the duration of excursions is calculated in minutes and is associated with periods of geyser activity. Very often, the display of natural objects, especially in caves, is accompanied by color lighting, music, and theatrical performances demonstrating scenes from the life of the aborigines. This type of ecotourism is most developed in Australia, therefore it is identified with the “Australian model of ecotourism development”.

    History of the emergence and development of ecotourism

The idea of ​​ecotourism developed inextricably from the concept of sustainable development, the origins of which were developed by the Russian scientist Vernadsky. The term itself is closely related to definitions used by the UN in the 1970s, such as “development without destruction”, and “eco-development”, that is, environmentally sound development that has the least negative impact on the environment.

In the early 80s. In the 20th century, the first scientific studies began to appear in the press devoted to the study of the negative impacts of excess tourist flows on recreational areas. It is not surprising that the birthplace of these publications was Europe - a densely populated, industrialized part of the planet that leads in the development of tourism. In 1980, the West German magazine TEO published an article by R. Junck “How many tourists per hectare of beach? A word in defense of “soft” tourism.” In 1981, the book by H. Weiss “Peaceful destruction of the landscape and measures to save it in Switzerland” was published. The development of this direction led to the emergence of the concepts of “soft tourism” and “green tourism”, which included recommendations for the conscious, environmentally sound use of natural areas for recreational purposes.

Mid 80's XX century was characterized by increased activity to create new protected natural areas, the development of recommendations for the organization of tourism activities in these territories, and legislative support for environmental protection.

In 1990, ecotourism was given official status, with which it acquired the right to convene its own annual international symposium “Annual World Congress on Adventure Travel & Ecotourism” and create its own non-profit organizations.

As the problems became more urgent, the number of publications, conferences and meetings devoted to the rational use of natural, cultural and historical tourism resources increased. In 1999 alone, more than 400 works on this topic were published abroad. The result of an intense search was the concept of sustainable tourism development in the 21st century developed in 1996 by UNWTO, the World Travel and Tourism Council and the Earth Council: “Agenda 21 for travel and tourism industry”. The agenda was addressed to national tourism administrations, tourism and trade organizations, as well as consumers of tourism services.
The concept is based on Agenda 21, a comprehensive program of action adopted by 182 governments at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development on June 14, 1992.
According to Agenda 21, sustainable development is understood as a process that occurs without causing damage to tourism resources. This is achieved by managing resources so that they can be renewed at the same rate at which they are used, or by switching from slowly renewable resources to rapidly renewable ones. Sustainable development is based on a combination of three components: sustainable social, economic and environmental development. It is these principles that underlie one of the types of sustainable tourism, namely ecotourism.
An important step in the evolution of ecotourism was the proclamation of 2002 by the United Nations as the International Year of Ecotourism, in connection with which the World Summit was held on May 19 - 22, 2002 under the auspices of the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) and the World Tourism Organization in Quebec (Canada). on ecotourism, in which 132 countries of the world took part. The Quebec Declaration on Ecotourism was adopted here, which contains recommendations for the development of ecotourism in different countries. The summit recognized that "ecotourism is built on the principles of sustainable tourism, taking into account its impacts on the economic, social and natural environment." In addition, the Quebec Declaration has identified the following specific principles that distinguish ecotourism from the broader concept of sustainable tourism:
active promotion of the conservation of natural and cultural heritage,
involving local and indigenous communities in the planning, development and implementation of ecotourism activities that enhance their well-being;
explaining to tourists the importance of the natural and cultural heritage of the visited tourist centers;
targeting individual travelers and small organized tourist groups.

A significant event for the further development of ecotourism was the World Ecotourism Conference, which was held in Oslo, Norway from 14 to 16 May and marked the fifth anniversary of the Quebec summit. The conference was organized by TIES, the Norwegian Ecotourism Society and UNEP. It was attended by about 450 delegates from more than 70 countries. As a result, the achievements and problems of ecotourism since 2002, issues of joint work of national and regional associations and ecotourism professionals around the world were considered

Thus, the concept of ecotourism, which originated in the 70-80s. XX century, went through a number of stages of development - from an “elite” and little-familiar type of recreation for most people to an internationally recognized and actively developing trend in the tourism industry. Many non-profit organizations in the field of ecotourism have emerged, and specialized thematic symposiums, conferences, congresses and exhibitions have begun to be held on an ongoing basis. The most important event in the development of ecotourism was the proclamation of 2002 as the International Year of Ecotourism and the holding within its framework of the World Summit on Ecotourism, and then, 5 years later, the World Conference on Ecotourism in Oslo. The global ecotourism community has grown significantly and continues to grow, which gives reason to talk about serious steps in strengthening the position of ecotourism in the global travel industry market.


Development of ecotourism in Kazakhstan
Ecotourism is currently a priority industry and contributes to sustainable economic development. An analysis of the tourism market in Kazakhstan conducted by the Kazakhstan Tourism Association (KTA) and experts from IPK in 2005 showed that Kazakhstan has enormous potential for untouched nature with a large number of national parks and reserves, as well as an outstanding cultural heritage.

Research and survey (about 10,000 questionnaires) conducted in Germany. Great Britain, France, South Korea and Japan showed that among foreigners there is a high interest in environmental tours to Kazakhstan.

Kazakhstan can be compared to a tourism diamond, with excellent tourism opportunities and looking forward to further changes to create global competitiveness.
To transform our country into a renowned tourist destination by 2020, an investment of $1 billion will be required.

The study showed that 14.2 million tourists from Europe to Asia are interested in Kazakhstan as a tourist destination. At the end of 2008, the number of people who entered Kazakhstan for the purpose of tourism was: 618,732 people, domestic tourism - 2,183,973 people, and according to the results of the first; half of 2009 - 127,414 and 355,488 people, respectively.

The main tourism product of Kazakhstan is ecotourism, which has weak competitiveness in the international market. Potential interest in this tourism product is 8.9 million people (or 63% of the total potential). It occupies the best position in the global tourism market and should be one of the key ones for development in Kazakhstan. What can we offer to the international tourism market today? These are our natural resources, untouched landscapes of amazing beauty. Despite this, ecotourism today is not a priority for state tourism policy. This type of tourism, which has a pronounced social aspect, is not highlighted in any strategic government document. KTA, representing the interests of the tourism market, clearly understands that ecotourism can generate income both for the country’s budget and for the tourism market. Therefore, in 2003, KTA conducted a preliminary analysis to assess the potential for ecotourism development in Kazakhstan. Based on the results of the work done, it became clear that ecotourism needs development and our close attention. Moreover, each region of the republic has unique natural resources for the development of ecotourism (Table 1).

Table 1 Types of tourism by region of Kazakhstan

Types of tourism by region
Southern Kazakhstan Northern Kazakhstan Central Kazakhstan Eastern Kazakhstan Western Kazakhstan
Ecological Ecological Ecological Ecological Ecological
Mountain Ski Sightseeing Mountain Water
On foot On foot Water Cognitive On foot
Bicycle Sightseeing Speleological Sightseeing Sightseeing
Sightseeing Historical Historical
Historical Pilgrimage
Pilgrimage
In the same year, 4 pilot projects financed by the Eurasia Foundation were implemented in four regions: Lepsinsk, Zhabagly, Katon-Karagay and Ridder. During their implementation, good results were obtained, for example, about 600 foreign tourists were received in Zhabagly in 2004; based on the results of the analysis of visitor questionnaires, it was revealed that the level of service provided in CBT (Community Based Tourism - communities based on tourism - COT) meets minimum quality standards.

It was clear that it was necessary to create a single body that would support the development of eco-tourism in the republic. It was the first in Kazakhstan (unfortunately, it still remains the only one) Information and Resource Center for Ecotourism (IRCE), created by KTA in 2005 in Almaty with the financial support of the Eurasia Foundation.

The IRTS project is providing information on the international and Kazakh tourism market, supporting local communities based on tourism (TBT) and helping them create sustainable income through the development of ecotourism.
The creation and financing of the IRCE justifies its effectiveness, which can be seen from its own statistics, which show an annual increase in attendance by an average of 20-25%.

Table 2 IRCE statistics*

Statistics 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Q1 Total
Ecosites 210 423 508 642 47 1830
Weekend tours 349 594 681 988 30 2642
Individual tours 28 65 277 360 8 738
Visit to the center 351 457 639 492 355 2294
Total: 938 1539 2105 2482 440 7504
Among them are foreigners 632 1245 1801 2016 344 6038
- Kazakhstanis 306 294 304 466 96 1466
(* IRCE’s own statistics)

In July 2004, the Eurasia Foundation and ExxonMobil Kazakhstan Inc. launched a program to help strengthen local communities in Kazakhstan through the development of ecotourism. It is based on previous ecotourism projects implemented by the Foundation in 2003-2004. In 2007, the ABN AMRO Foundation joined the initiative.
Target

    conservation of natural resources and creation of economic opportunities for residents of rural regions located in close proximity to protected areas of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
Tasks
    creation, development and promotion of new ecotourism destinations based on rural communities;
    reducing recreational load on protected natural areas;
    training of qualified personnel in the field of ecotourism;
    establishing partnerships between communities, government agencies and businesses.
Budget
    Since 2004, EFCA has attracted and invested more than 400 thousand US dollars in the ecotourism development initiative in Kazakhstan. In 2007, the program's budget was more than $140,000.

Growth dynamics and capacity of the ecotourism market

According to the WTO, in 1993 ecotourism accounted for 7% of all international travel, and according to calculations by the World Resources Institute, with an overall annual growth of global tourism of 4%, the number of visits and income from ecotourism in various regions of the world is increasing by 10 - 30% annually . The highest rates are typical for the Asia-Pacific
tourist region. According to experts, from 40 to 60% of all international tourists visit ecotourism centers, of which 20-40% are focused on wildlife tourism resources.

Table 1.3
Growth dynamics of international arrivals in the global ecotourism market (million people) Revenue from total arrivals 388 416 Income from arrivals at ecotourism destinations 93 166 Income from wildlife-oriented tourists 47 83
A study of US tour operators operating in international ecotourism found that in 1987, of 78, only three had more than 1,000 clients per year. By 1992, supply growth was 125% of the eighties level. In 1994, there were already 35 firms serving more than 1,000 international ecotourists per year, and the top five controlled 40% of the market with 49,012 clients per year.

In Nepal, from 1980 to 1991, the number of tourists taking part in trekking tours increased by 255%. For example, in the spring of 2000, more than 50 international expeditions were in the Everest region. The Kingdom earns up to $200 million annually from ecotourism. In Costa Rica, one of the leading ecotourism host countries, the number of annual ecotourism arrivals is growing by 781 thousand. More than 66% of tourists visiting the country travel to protected areas. In Honduras, the annual increase in ecotourism is 13-15%. In Kenya for the period 1983-1993. the number of ecotourists increased by 45%. More than 80% of tourists arriving in the country are focused on natural tourism resources.

Factors and forecasts for the development of ecotourism

Analyzing the dynamics of international travel, forecasts of international tourism organizations (WTO, WTTC), and the opinions of domestic experts, we can highlight the following trends in the development of modern international tourism in general and ecotourism in particular.

According to the WTO Tourism Vision 2020, by 2020 the number of international tourist visits will increase to 1.6 billion. In 2000, 702 million international visits were expected, in 2010 - 1.018 billion, in 2020 - 1.6 billion visits. This is 3 times higher than in 1996 (592 million visits). At the same time, it is necessary to remember that work on the unification of national systems for recording tourism development has just begun. Therefore, you should not consider these figures as final. But even under the current conditions, we can talk about a more than favorable forecast for the development of the industry.
In the near future, the most promising types of tourism will be cruises, ecological, adventure, educational and thematic tourism.
Many authors predict an increase in demand for travel services among the group of tourists of retirement age (seniors). Availability of free time, material wealth, psychological and social hedonization - all this allows us to look with optimism at future generations. Many of the seniors, especially from the USA, Germany and Japan, take part in ecotours. This trend is clearly demonstrated by the average age of international ecotourists - 35-54 years.
In the type structure of international tourism, an increase in long-term travel is predicted from 24% in 1995 to 32% in 2020. Moreover, every third will be associated with another region of the world. This increases interest in mountainous areas that have not yet been involved in mass international ecotourism, such as the Caucasus.
Based on the above, we can identify the main factors in the development of the global ecotourism market (Fig. 1.2).


Rice. 1.2. Modern factors in the development of the global ecotourism market.

CONCLUSION

“Ecotourism is a type of tourism based on tourist demand, associated with tourist needs to understand nature and indigenous culture, as well as contribute to the conservation of ecosystems and economic development of the region, while respecting the socio-economic interests of the local population.”
etc.............

The emergence and development of ecological tourism is closely connected with the history of identifying natural areas that are especially attractive from aesthetic and recreational points of view and the development of standards for their protection.

The end of the 19th century can rightfully be considered the time of the emergence of ecotourism. The majestic natural rarities of the American continent could not help but shake the imagination of people from European countries, where the scale of the territories is less impressive, and the territories themselves have long been inhabited and urbanized. The qualities of the settlers, such as mobility, enterprise, sociability and receptivity to information, forced them to move inland, occupy and develop new lands, endure inconvenience and endure dangers. Information about new impressive natural areas quickly spread, and by the end of the 19th century the number of tourists visiting areas such as Yellowstone, Yosemite in the Sierra Nevada and some other majestic natural monuments had increased so much that special measures were required to protect this region. The first national park in North America was established in 1872. In Yellowstone. The main tasks that the organizers of national parks in the USA, Canada, Mexico, Argentina, New Zealand, Australia, Indonesia, and South Africa set for themselves were the protection of the “works” of nature in order to satisfy people’s need for recreation. The idea of ​​creating protected areas in the West was based on their recreational purpose. In accordance with this, the protection regime, the organization of use and the internal structure of national parks were established. In American-type national parks, the main efforts were directed toward organizing recreational tourism. Already at the end of the 19th century. In the unique corners of nature of the “Wild West”, a whole series of national parks were created, formed according to the classical North American model. The process of creating national parks intensified after the Second World War. So, if in 1950 In 39 countries there were about 200 parks, then in 1982. Their number is already more than 1000. National parks were intensively advertised, networks of hiking trails and roads for mechanical transport were laid in them, recreation areas and observation decks were arranged, hotels, catering facilities, tourist equipment rental bases, communication enterprises, etc. were built. All these measures contributed to the growth of interest in national parks.

The peculiarities of the emergence and development of ecological tourism in Russia are largely due to the political and economic changes taking place in the country after 1990. The demand for previously prevailing travel and recreation within the country has sharply decreased, and the demand for previously very few trips to foreign tourism centers has sharply increased. The main reason for the extreme decline in domestic tourism is the cessation of its funding by the state and trade unions. The flow of foreign tourists coming to Russia has also decreased. Thus, socio-economic factors in recent years have not contributed to the full and balanced development of Russian tourism in general and ecotourism in particular.

Ecotourism today is one of the most rapidly developing sectors of the tourism industry.

Every year, goods and services worth $55 billion are produced for the needs of ecotourism, which is 25% of international trade in the services sector and 12% of the gross world product. The annual growth of ecotourism itself is 30% per year

Currently, many developed and developing countries are urgently allocating vast areas of their territory for nature reserves and national parks, creating special organized structures to attract ecotourists, and thus their capital. Costa Rica, for example, has declared 30% of its territory a conservation area. Tourism in this country is becoming a leading source of income. Annual income from ecotourism in the United States reaches $220 million and tends to grow rapidly. Kenya's income from the use of national parks is $450 million. Ecuador annually receives more than $180 million from ecotourism in the Galapagos Islands.

The countries of Southeast Asia demonstrate great interest in the development of ecotourism in their territories. In a number of countries in Africa, Asia, Latin America (Xenia, Tanzania, Chile, Peru, Nepal, etc.), which have realized the undoubted advantages of developing eco-tourism on their territory and have invested in this sector of the national economy, eco-tourism is becoming one of the main sources of income. The Ecotourism Society, headquartered in Washington, D.C., serves as a center for research, advocacy, and policy development. The society forms policies and develops programs aimed at creating regional connections and involving regional structures in this work. There are a number of organizations that are looking for regions where ecotourism could replace traditional forms of tourism. These include: WWF, World Resources Institute, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources and UNESCO. Since 1971 UNESCO is developing the Man and the Biosphere program. The UNESCO World Heritage Committee has the power to award the status of "World Heritage Site" to areas of exceptional interest and universal value. A major role in the development of ecotourism is played by the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), which conducts research aimed at determining the possibility of engaging in ecotourism in developing countries and finances projects related to ecotourism. Academic research institutions, museums and zoological societies in developed countries play an active role in supporting ecotourism and developing ecotourism programs. Governments of individual countries are promoting the development of ecotourism. Thus, in Canada and Belize (Central America), special departments or advisory councils on ecotourism have been created under the ministries of tourism. The Costa Rican government has made the development of ecotourism in the country a key issue in its party program.

An analysis of historical experience shows that Russia has a long tradition of developing tourism activities, very close in nature to ecological tourism. These origins go back to the 70s of the 19th century, when the “Society of Natural History Lovers and the Alpine Caucasian Club” was created in Tiflis, which at that time was part of the borders of Russia. Following him, in the 90s of the 19th century, the Crimean Mountain Club was established in Odessa.

The history of domestic tourism knows many more examples of the activities of various societies and associations, clubs and groups that devoted their time to hiking in remote corners of nature with a poorly developed network of recreational services, but rich and unique nature.

In Russia, ecotourism is developing slowly and spontaneously. However, the number of projects being developed is growing. Evidence of this is local initiatives - in Adygea, on the Black Sea coast, in the Volga region, Altai, the Far East and Kamchatka.

At the same time, both domestic and foreign tourism organizers assess Russia’s ecotourism potential as extremely high. In recent years, international organizations have also shown a clear strategic interest in Russia’s ecotourism potential. The development of ecological tourism in Russia has become an integral part of the program of activities of the Environmental Education Center "Zapovedniki", created in 1996. The Center studies information, advertising and popular science products that introduce the general public to protected areas.

One of the first organizations that fully devoted its activities to the development of ecotourism in Russia is the Dersu Uzala Ecotourism Development Fund. The main direction of the Fund’s work is the development and practical implementation of various projects for the development of ecotourism in different regions of Russia.

In 1998, an autonomous non-profit organization was created in Russia - the Center for Ecological Travel. Its main goal is the development of scientific, educational and adventure tourism on the basis of Russian nature reserves and national parks.

In general, the nature of Russia presents great potential opportunities for the development of ecotourism: the diversity, uniqueness, attractiveness and vastness of Russian landscapes, not yet covered by urbanization processes, intensive agricultural production, etc., are very great. There are 35 national parks on the territory of Russia (with a total area of ​​6,925,696 hectares, which is 0.4% of the area of ​​Russia), and their number continues to increase. The status of national parks directly implies their use for tourism.

Areas with traditional, indigenous forms of farming, which are of great ecological and cultural value, have also been preserved in Russia. There are still many such areas in the north of the country, in Siberia, in the mountains. It should, however, be borne in mind that, despite the vastness of undeveloped or poorly developed spaces, the state of the environment in Russia as a whole is far from favorable, including outside the largest industrial centers.

This situation is due to backward technologies both in industry and in agriculture and forestry, weak control over monopolistic companies that extract raw materials, as a rule, in remote areas. Finally, one of the limitations for the development of tourism and even ecotourism is the high sensitivity of many Russian ecosystems to anthropogenic influences and their fragility, especially in areas that are attractive to tourists for their wildlife or indigenous forms of farming. A typical example is the degradation of the vegetation cover of the tundra, where excessively large herds of reindeer graze, the size of which was determined without due consideration of the pasture capacity. Almost all forms of ecotourism are represented in small quantities in Russia.

The most widespread of these forms are one-day excursions of environmental orientation, made either by city residents or tourists staying at resorts and other recreational places. This can be judged by information about the attendance of the country's national parks. Nine of them, located near large cities, receive approximately 1.5 million people per year. One park, Prielbrussky, located in the Caucasus and specializing in mountain and ski tourism, receives 300 thousand visitors a year. All other parks together, remote from large cities, are visited by 80 to 100 thousand people per year.

In general, the educational aspect in Russian ecotourism is still poorly developed - more often than not, excursions or tours are aimed only at demonstrating attractions, exotic wonders and the beauties of nature, and not at understanding environmental problems.

Among the main prerequisites for the emergence of ecotourism, the leading role is occupied by the increasing anthropogenic load on natural, cultural and historical tourist resources due to the mass of tourism. This load increases in direct proportion to the growth rate of tourist visits. Considering the indicators of tourism development predicted by the World Tourism Organization (WTO) in the 21st century, it becomes obvious that there are growing contradictions in the issue of meeting tourism demand and the rational use of tourism resources.

Negative aspects of the impact of mass tourism on the environment and tourism resources were noted back in the 70s in foreign and domestic studies. Today, anthropogenic pressure and its inhibitory influence on development are observed in almost all sectors of the tourism industry and types of tourism, in the vast majority of tourist areas. For example, already in 1973-1983. In Poland, for this reason, the length of tourist water routes along rivers and lakes has decreased by 40%, and sea routes by 70%. The area of ​​damaged forests increased by 60%. Since 1976, in the USA, in the Balinger Canyon, as a result of the movement of vehicles serving tourists, the average rate of soil and soil loss was 86 times higher than the maximum permissible.

As the globalization of the world economy grows, negative changes in the geographical surface of the Earth also grow, in particular:

Climate change; - soil and land degradation;

Destruction of ecosystems and reduction of biodiversity;

Increased water, soil and air pollution;

Natural disasters caused by human activities;

Uncontrolled population growth and increasing inequality in socio-economic development;

Food security and increasing threats to public health;

Limited energy reserves and other types of natural resources.

Given the global nature of these problems, it is impossible to solve them at the regional or national level.

The German Council of Global Change Advisors has identified the following typical problem patterns that are repeated in many regions of the world. By analogy with diseases, they were called syndromes:

1) utilization syndromes. For example, over-cultivation of marginal lands (“Sahel syndrome”), or recreational development and destruction of nature (mass tourism syndrome);

2) developmental syndromes. For example, environmental destruction of landscapes due to the implementation of inadequate development programs (“Aral syndrome”), or ignoring environmental standards during rapid economic development (“Asian Tiger syndrome”);

3) waste syndromes. For example, environmental degradation due to controlled and uncontrolled waste disposal (“dumping syndrome”).

As the problems became more urgent, the number of publications, conferences and meetings devoted to the rational use of natural, cultural and historical tourism resources increased. In 1999 alone, more than 400 works on this topic were published abroad. The result of an intense search was the concept of sustainable tourism development in the 21st century developed in 1996 by the WTO, the World Travel and Tourism Council (WTTC), and the Green World organization: “Agenda 21 for travel and tourism industry.” It was addressed to national tourism administrations, tourism and trade organizations, as well as consumers of tourism services. The concept is based on Agenda 21 for the Travel and Tourism Industry, a comprehensive program of action adopted by 182 governments at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) on June 14, 1992. Sustainable development refers to a process that occurs without harming tourism resources. This is achieved by managing resources so that they can be renewed at the same rate at which they are used, or by switching from slowly renewable resources to rapidly renewable ones.

Agenda 21 contains the following provisions:

It is stated that the travel and tourism industry is interested in protecting the natural and cultural resources that are the core of the tourism business;

Emphasizes the importance of coordinating the joint efforts of governments, industry and non-governmental organizations to create a strategy for long-term development;

Areas of priority action with specific goals and steps to achieve them are listed.

Highlights the importance of partnerships between government, industry and non-governmental organizations, examines the strategic and economic importance of travel and tourism, and demonstrates the enormous benefits of creating a viable tourism industry. The document calls for using the following principles in tourism development:

Travel and tourism should help people achieve harmony with nature;

Travel and tourism must contribute to the conservation, protection and restoration of ecosystems;

Travel and tourism must be based on sustainable production and consumption patterns;

The policy of protectionism in the travel and tourism services trade should be partially or completely changed;

Environmental protection should be an integral part of the tourism development process;

Problems of tourism development must be solved with the participation of interested citizens (local residents), with planning decisions made at the local level;

States must warn each other regarding natural disasters that may directly affect tourists or tourism sectors;

Travel and tourism should help create jobs for women and local people;

Tourism development must ensure and support the culture and interests of local peoples;

The tourism and travel industry should be based on international environmental law.

Nine priority areas for the work of national tourism administrations were outlined:

1. Assess the capacity of existing tourism infrastructure to ensure sustainable tourism.

2. Assessment of economic, social, cultural and natural components of the development of tourism organizations.

3. Training, education and public understanding of sustainable development processes.

4. Planning for sustainable tourism development.

5. Exchange of information, experience and technologies for sustainable tourism between developed and developing countries.

6. Ensuring participation in the development process of all sectors of society.

7. Development of tourism products in compliance with the principles of sustainable development at their core, as an integral part of the tourism development process.

8. Measuring progress towards sustainable development at the local level. 9. Partnership for sustainable development.

In turn, 10 tasks were formulated for tourism companies:

1) minimization, reuse and recycling of the process of using natural tourism resources;

2) conservation and management of energy used;

3) freshwater resource management;

4) wastewater management;

5) management of hazardous substances;

6) transport and transportation management;

7) planning and management of land use;

8) involvement of employees, clients, local residents in solving environmental problems;

9) development of sustainable development projects;

10) partnership for sustainable development. The document, addressed to governments, industry, non-governmental organizations and the media, was widely circulated. After the adoption of this document, a 5-year program began to promote the implementation of its resolutions in regions of the world. The first two meetings, held in London (February 1997) and Jakarta (November 1997), led to the following conclusions:

The tourism industry has real potential to contribute to sustainable development with effective management and sound regulation. Agenda 21 should be widely disseminated as the main document for the development of the industry, and compliance by all parties with its provisions should be encouraged;

Close collaboration is required between consumers, the public, private sectors and tourism industry organizations;

There is a need to have many systems in place to measure progress towards sustainable development goals;

The process of expansion of tourism infrastructure should be managed in relation to the goals of sustainable tourism;

Environmental taxes should be fair and non-discriminatory, and funds raised should be allocated to the tourism industry for environmental programs;

International, national and local funding bodies should include sustainable development as part of the criteria for selecting recipients of economic support;

Modern research into sustainable development should be immediately introduced into tour operator activities;

Education in the field of environmental protection should be strengthened, especially in educational institutions that train personnel for hotels and tourism firms;

Advertising plays an important role in motivating consumers and thus forcing the industry to operate on new principles. This must be achieved through: showing videos on airplanes and airports, publishing articles in magazines for reading while traveling, advertisements, useful tips on tickets, travel accessories and brochures containing information for vacationers;

Further workshops should be held in different regions of the world to explore the application of Agenda 21 principles to specific contexts, while ensuring their full implementation.

The principles of sustainable tourism development are also reflected in the Global Code of Ethics for Tourism, work on which was started by WTO experts back in 1997. The preamble to the document states that “in solemnly accepting it, representatives of the global tourism industry, delegates of states, territories, enterprises, institutions and WTO member organizations, aim to promote the development of responsible, sustainable and accessible tourism within the framework of the realization of the right to holiday and travel while respecting the public choices of all peoples and express the desire to contribute to the establishment of a fair, responsible and sustainable world tourism order that will bring benefits to all sectors of society in an open and competitive global market economy.”

Problems of sustainable development are especially relevant for unique natural objects and phenomena, natural reserves involved in tourism. Often, residents of the territories adjacent to such objects exist only at the expense of income from tourists. This is especially true for mountainous areas. It is no coincidence that 2002, by decision of the UN General Assembly, was declared the International Year of Mountains and the International Year of Ecotourism. This opens up great opportunities for cooperation and combining the efforts of all interested parties in achieving the best possible results during these two events.

In 2002, the UN also celebrated the 10th anniversary of the Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro, where Agenda 21 was adopted and subsequent adjustments were made for the further implementation and development of the program.

However, the concept of sustainable development has been viewed with skepticism by many tourism experts. This was largely due to the unfortunate phrase - “sustainable (static, motionless) development (movement, dynamics).” It would probably be more correct to talk about “viable development”.

In addition, at the regional level the word “development” should not be understood as a desire to achieve Western standards of living. The direction of the socio-economic movement of local communities is determined by the residents themselves, and not by outsiders with power. In this regard, it is necessary to take more into account traditions, rather than advertising promises. As American ecotourism expert Ron Mader said: “Development is not about imitating the West. These are not only financial-industrial complexes, chemical fertilizers and giant water-energy dams. There is no need to sell your soul for consumer goods and get-rich-quick schemes. Development is an awakening, awareness of one’s inner wealth and the true potential of the individual and society.”